This topic (antinatalism) is about the prevention of unnecessary harm.
How about you
prevent unnecessary harm by stopping this thread
An attempt to trivialise or whitewash the grotesque and needless suffering being experienced by sentient beings on this planet. A clear sign of desperation.
You've made your point, people can look at it if they want. Everyone can see that you're just trolling by carrying on. Whether you have some kind of deap seated childhood issue or are in some other way mentally imbalanced, you've said what you felt you need to say, so don't keep on saying it.
Question to mods: why has this not been locked as a troll thread?
You may wish to provide evidence of the said trolling. Thanks for posting and all the best.
This topic is almost identical to my thinking while I was in high school.
Thoughts that procreation is delivering a child into harm and death? You must have been a very enlightened student
Bottom line, it's useless and pathetic. Either you kill yourself or you don't.
If you set in motion an action to actually kill yourself but can't because you feel a visceral block(I called it biological imperative) most likely you will never kill yourself.
I agree that Life is useless and pathetic. I'd rather not create useless and pathetic beings who suffer. Please note that antinatalism and suicide are different subjects/topics.
Now, while everything said in the OP is true and life certainly is an abysmal state of being which can naturally only conclude with systemic degradation of body and mind(without any purpose other than which you assign for yourself), thinking about it is useless and wasteful.
I don't mind thinking about this and other related subjects. I'd say creating beings who suffer is useless and wasteful.
I imagine when I get older and reach a point when everything will go down hill fast, I will definitely kill myself. As you are probably aware suicide rate amongst older population is way higher than their percentage of general population.
This is of course perfectly reasonable and expected. After all, we have the common sense and humanity to euthanize old dogs who can barely walk but due to immature development of human civilization which still has its roots in superstition we force people the endure the torture of old age.
We can avoid these and other tragic aspects of the human condition by not creating new victims.
Please explain why you think this topic is "non-sense".
Because a great deal of people are not finding life all that depressing, but enjoying it. You imposition that life is suffering is plainly wrong. Your life may be - but you can do something about that.
Who's arguing that a great deal of people are depressed and not experiencing joy? Who said "life is suffering"? Our psychology does not justify or change the fact that procreation is delivering children into harm and death.
Antinatalism is based on the principle that suffering of whatever kind or degree should not be caused or perpetuated, and that human existence necessarily entails suffering that we can neither escape nor justify, least of all by experiencing pleasures. Thus, the only way to end all suffering would be to cease producing beings who suffer.
It's not a principle, it's an assumption. I don't suffer. If one day I should, it will have been worth it, 'cause my life's been great thus far.
Sentient beings experience varying degrees of negative mental states (suffer) is a fact. 'Suffering of whatever kind or degree should not be caused or perpetuated' is a value judgement.