Well the HR-03 can cope with a 4870 with a bit of help from a fan so I wouldn't be so pessimistic.Modo wrote:Sorry if I was not precise enough. I was not referring to idling, but to active use, like 3D gaming. Sadly, that probably won't be helped by new drivers, and it might prevent graphics cards' manufacturers from making parts with factory-designed fanless cooling.
Dont understand...hd4850 10w idle @ 68c
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
HD 4850 with Powerplay working (fixed BIOS):
http://gathering.tweakers.net/forum/vie ... e/30312532
29º C
http://gathering.tweakers.net/forum/vie ... e/30312532
29º C
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 1809
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 1:45 am
- Location: At Home
I used the Xbitlabs power data in combination with the performance data from Expreview and calculated performance per watt data; the figures are normalised against the HD 4850 which is assigned a value of 100:
HD 4850 / HD 3870 / 9800 GTX
No AA/AF - 100 / 102 / 98
AA/AF - 100 / 86 / 85
So the gain is purely when using AA/AF which isn’t surprising considering they’ve beefed up that side of the architecture. The 9800 GTX+ may match the HD 4850 in the performance per watt stakes.
HD 4850 / HD 3870 / 9800 GTX
No AA/AF - 100 / 102 / 98
AA/AF - 100 / 86 / 85
So the gain is purely when using AA/AF which isn’t surprising considering they’ve beefed up that side of the architecture. The 9800 GTX+ may match the HD 4850 in the performance per watt stakes.
After reading in this thread that some of the MSI cards have a newer bios that clocks lower while in a 2D profile I can across this review:
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Powe ... 50/21.html
What I found interesting is that the review data included both an MSI and Power Colour 4850…
System power consumption – Idle
MSI 124W
Powercolor 128W
System power consumption – Peak
MSI 208W
Powercolor 208W
So there is a difference of 4 watts at idle which I’m guessing is due to the fact that the MSI card was using the newer bios.
So last night I decided to take a brave pill and flash my brand new HIS 4850 with the newer bios which can be found here:
http://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/1635 ... 80605.html
I used Winflash 2.0.1 to reprogram the bios and also used GPU-Z to backup the original bios should anything go wrong:
http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/11 ... 0.1.2.html
Luckily it went smoothly and after a reboot GPU-Z was reporting the following while idle…
As you can see the newer bios 11.004 is working and I noticed a drop in idle temps of around 2C, not a huge amount but certainly better than nothing. Note I am using the official 8.6 Cat drivers and have not yet installed the hotfix.
This is what the newer 11.004 bios looks like in Radeon Bios Editor which be found here:
http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/Utilities/RBE/
Now I’ve not had any experience using this utility but it looks like it would be fairly easy to adjust the 2D profile to further reduce gpu core and memory speeds, and voltage.
What do you guys think perhaps someone with more experience would fancy giving it a go?
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Powe ... 50/21.html
What I found interesting is that the review data included both an MSI and Power Colour 4850…
System power consumption – Idle
MSI 124W
Powercolor 128W
System power consumption – Peak
MSI 208W
Powercolor 208W
So there is a difference of 4 watts at idle which I’m guessing is due to the fact that the MSI card was using the newer bios.
So last night I decided to take a brave pill and flash my brand new HIS 4850 with the newer bios which can be found here:
http://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/1635 ... 80605.html
I used Winflash 2.0.1 to reprogram the bios and also used GPU-Z to backup the original bios should anything go wrong:
http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/11 ... 0.1.2.html
Luckily it went smoothly and after a reboot GPU-Z was reporting the following while idle…
As you can see the newer bios 11.004 is working and I noticed a drop in idle temps of around 2C, not a huge amount but certainly better than nothing. Note I am using the official 8.6 Cat drivers and have not yet installed the hotfix.
This is what the newer 11.004 bios looks like in Radeon Bios Editor which be found here:
http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/Utilities/RBE/
Now I’ve not had any experience using this utility but it looks like it would be fairly easy to adjust the 2D profile to further reduce gpu core and memory speeds, and voltage.
What do you guys think perhaps someone with more experience would fancy giving it a go?
Last edited by elitezoid on Sat Jun 28, 2008 11:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
** UPDATE ** Probably best to hold fire before flashing with a bios file modified with the latest version of RBE, could be some issues with it... http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/sho ... p?t=192759
** Edit ** a fix has been found, seems that the problem was isolated to the 4870 cards and DDR5 memory.
http://www.techpowerup.com/articles/ove ... idcard/152
** Edit ** a fix has been found, seems that the problem was isolated to the 4870 cards and DDR5 memory.
http://www.techpowerup.com/articles/ove ... idcard/152
Last edited by elitezoid on Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:27 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:10 pm
- Location: Toronto - Ontario - Canada
The Accelero S1 fits the HD 4850 heres heads up for those looking for verification. This guy at RFD deals installed one.
h*tp://www.redflagdeals.com/forums/showthread.php?t=604702
h*tp://www.redflagdeals.com/forums/showthread.php?t=604702
Unfortunately I don't have any equipment to monitor power consumption so no way of telling, although I'd also be very interested to find out!ryboto wrote:Thanks for the report, do you have any way to test the idle power consumption of the system after the BIOS update?elitezoid wrote:...
btw seems others have done the same bios update without any problems...
http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1319658
-
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:39 pm
Yup, I did the same thing. I flashed my Sapphire card with the MSI BIOS, and now the card idles at 160/500 instead of 500/750. You can do this with any 4850 card except the ASUS ones.elitezoid wrote:After reading in this thread that some of the MSI cards have a newer bios that clocks lower while in a 2D profile I can across this review:
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Powe ... 50/21.html
What I found interesting is that the review data included both an MSI and Power Colour 4850…
System power consumption – Idle
MSI 124W
Powercolor 128W
System power consumption – Peak
MSI 208W
Powercolor 208W
So there is a difference of 4 watts at idle which I’m guessing is due to the fact that the MSI card was using the newer bios.
So last night I decided to take a brave pill and flash my brand new HIS 4850 with the newer bios which can be found here:
http://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/1635 ... 80605.html
I used Winflash 2.0.1 to reprogram the bios and also used GPU-Z to backup the original bios should anything go wrong:
http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/11 ... 0.1.2.html
Luckily it went smoothly and after a reboot GPU-Z was reporting the following while idle…
As you can see the newer bios 11.004 is working and I noticed a drop in idle temps of around 2C, not a huge amount but certainly better than nothing. Note I am using the official 8.6 Cat drivers and have not yet installed the hotfix.
This is what the newer 11.004 bios looks like in Radeon Bios Editor which be found here:
http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/Utilities/RBE/
Now I’ve not had any experience using this utility but it looks like it would be fairly easy to adjust the 2D profile to further reduce gpu core and memory speeds, and voltage.
What do you guys think perhaps someone with more experience would fancy giving it a go?
Thread on the discussion:
http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1319658
So far, only one person at the hardforum has reported a problem flashing, and dozens have had success, so that's not too bad a risk. Still, you COULD BRICK THE CARD, so proceed with caution.
my experience with my 2600pro saw a 15C drop by lowering the gpu frequency from 600 to 100mhz, and memory from 1000 to 500mhz.
this was with atitool so i'm fairly sure that the voltage wasn't dropped in the process(- no voltage options were present), and the ati 2xxx series do not support powerplay.
perhaps gpus are affected differently to cpus? and lets not forget that a drop from 500 to 160 is pretty large.
this was with atitool so i'm fairly sure that the voltage wasn't dropped in the process(- no voltage options were present), and the ati 2xxx series do not support powerplay.
perhaps gpus are affected differently to cpus? and lets not forget that a drop from 500 to 160 is pretty large.
-
- Friend of SPCR
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:06 pm
- Location: New Hampshire, US
- Contact:
With the 3800's there is a difference in core voltage when in idle, there are actually 3 different settings depending on GPU load.wanky wrote:as we see with cpus just lowering the bus speeds makes hardly any difference to power consumption its the voltage that matters. given 3800 series has much better idle efficiency i wonder if it also lowered voltage.
lowering bus speeds with no voltage decrease is pointless IMO
Just a heads up, I have the ASUS EAH4850 in a new build. I didn't like the card's fan noise or the temps, so I ordered and installed a Accelero S1 on it. I am running it passive and have idle temps at 50 C (CPU = 47C, MB = 44C for reference). I'm in a hot room right now @ 30C. Running it with a 3D load, it never gets to 60CMatija wrote:Anyone here got the 4850 and tried cooling it passively?
I've already found some horror stories about overheating VRMs, people hacksawing original heatsinks, using fans to cool the card...
I put 6 of the 8 included mem heat sinks from the Accelero kit on the memory (the two sets of closer mem chips share one between them). The final two mem heat sinks I put on the VRMs. No issue here. Very satisfied.
-Deliriou5
Well, I guess we'll just have to swallow it - hardware that performs extreme (I don't hesitate using this term since the 4850 GPU is an excellent performer) and runs cool is simply a rare gift, like the 3870 was... If you want top gaming performance, you have to cope with much heat and noise. Well, one would expect things to calm down during 2D loads, but than again, if you concentrate on 2D loads, why buy such a beast... A clever technology like HybridPower or similar would be a very nice solution, but as far as I see right now these tricks simply don't work as expected.
But it should not be like that! How hard can it be to construct a GPU capable of running in a low power mode? If 3870 could do it, then any other graphics card coming after should be able to do the same, and better than the 3870.npp wrote:Well, I guess we'll just have to swallow it - hardware that performs extreme (I don't hesitate using this term since the 4850 GPU is an excellent performer) and runs cool is simply a rare gift, like the 3870 was...
I know I will never buy a card that draws more than my 3870 at idle. Doesn't matter if the performance is more than double that of the 3870 - if the idle power consumption is more than say 1-2W higher than my current card, I'm not buying. That is easy for me to say though, since I seldom play games any more and never play any new titles at all, but that is not because I don't want to. I marvel at demo movies showing off new hot graphics, like the recent movie of S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Clear Sky with the rain and stuff. I would love to play that game, but no game experience is worth almost doubling the idle power consumption of my whole system.
HybridPower looks nice but I think it's a bit too complicated. Already the low power feature of the 3870 is too complex, requiring driver support for something that the card imho should control thorugh it's bios/fw (maybe that's impossible; I don't really know much about the inner workings of a graphics card).
My idle power consumption in Linux is 10-15W higher than in Windows, despite the fact that I'm running the closed source drivers in both OSs. If the card could manage the different power modes without driver support it would not matter what OS I use.
Sorry about the OT rant.
Unfortunately it is largely impossible for the card to do it's own power management, independent of the drivers. Well, not impossible, but it would increase the cost of the card a lot.
The GPU is not a general purpose processor, and is not suitable for that kind of thing. The BIOS code is actually run by the computer's main CPU. It only does basic start-up of the card - all the more complex stuff is handled by the driver alone.
Power management could work really well if implemented properly I think. It's a shame no-one has developed a system where some of the RAM is turned off when not needed. I don't need 1GB graphics memory on the desktop....
The GPU is not a general purpose processor, and is not suitable for that kind of thing. The BIOS code is actually run by the computer's main CPU. It only does basic start-up of the card - all the more complex stuff is handled by the driver alone.
Power management could work really well if implemented properly I think. It's a shame no-one has developed a system where some of the RAM is turned off when not needed. I don't need 1GB graphics memory on the desktop....
Unfortunately it is largely impossible for the card to do it's own power management, independent of the drivers. Well, not impossible, but it would increase the cost of the card a lot.
The GPU is not a general purpose processor, and is not suitable for that kind of thing. The BIOS code is actually run by the computer's main CPU. It only does basic start-up of the card - all the more complex stuff is handled by the driver alone.
Power management could work really well if implemented properly I think. It's a shame no-one has developed a system where some of the RAM is turned off when not needed. I don't need 1GB graphics memory on the desktop....
The GPU is not a general purpose processor, and is not suitable for that kind of thing. The BIOS code is actually run by the computer's main CPU. It only does basic start-up of the card - all the more complex stuff is handled by the driver alone.
Power management could work really well if implemented properly I think. It's a shame no-one has developed a system where some of the RAM is turned off when not needed. I don't need 1GB graphics memory on the desktop....
-
- Friend of SPCR
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:06 pm
- Location: New Hampshire, US
- Contact:
I feel the same as you. I was talking to a friend today, and I said that I wouldn't have any problem purchasing a high end card, like one of the X2 models, so long as the idle power consumption is extremely minimal. We'll have to wait and see what the official drivers for the 4800 series actually do in regards to idle power.Vicotnik wrote: I know I will never buy a card that draws more than my 3870 at idle.