It is currently Mon Apr 21, 2014 7:42 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Seagate 7200.11 1.5TB: The Perfect Balance?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:16 pm 
Offline
SPCR Reviewer

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 9:07 pm
Posts: 1009
Location: Vancouver
Seagate 7200.11 1.5TB: The Perfect Balance?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:25 pm
Posts: 628
Location: Finland
Good to see Seagate is doing stuff in the right direction. First they finally fix faulty drives and now make their 1.5TB Barracuda better. The revolution has begun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seagate 7200.11 1.5TB: The Perfect Balance?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 3:56 pm
Posts: 16
Lawrence Lee wrote:


2nd to last paragraph of review should read:

"(Western Digital now has a 2TB Green Power)"

...not:

"(Western Digital now has a 2GB Green Power)"

Was searching for "2GB Green Power" and couldn't figure out why I wasn't getting any hits!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:39 pm 
Offline
Patron of SPCR

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:05 am
Posts: 744
Location: London
An improvement, but not good enough to regain its title of best drive maker around (it sure seems a while since it had that badge as well). 2TB Greenpowers should be shipping in the coming few weeks accoridng to most sites which will eliminate the biggest selling point for this drive (highest capacity).

_________________
I have no signature!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seagate 7200.11 1.5TB: The Perfect Balance?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 8:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 am
Posts: 372
Location: Seattle
dcuccia wrote:
Lawrence Lee wrote:


2nd to last paragraph of review should read:

"(Western Digital now has a 2TB Green Power)"

...not:

"(Western Digital now has a 2GB Green Power)"

Was searching for "2GB Green Power" and couldn't figure out why I wasn't getting any hits!


Or perhaps you had too many "hits" if you get my drift and I think you do (he said in a friendly and well meaning way)
sorry, couldn't resist.

_________________
Biostar 785GE
Intel D510
Asus EeePC N450 netbook
Evo HTC 4G
SAPPHIRE PURE Fusion Mini E350 AMD E-350 APU
Acer Aspire AS5250-BZ641 Notebook AMD Dual-Core Processor C-50
HifiMan REO, Sansa Clip+, JDS cMoy
click on an ad link each time you visit SPCR and help pay the bills.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 8:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:57 am
Posts: 530
Location: US
Unfortunately, the 2TB Green Powers are selling for $299 right now...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seagate 7200.11 1.5TB: The Perfect Balance?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 8:57 pm 
Offline
SPCR Reviewer

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 9:07 pm
Posts: 1009
Location: Vancouver
dcuccia wrote:
Was searching for "2GB Green Power" and couldn't figure out why I wasn't getting any hits!


Fixed. I think in my head I was thinking "GP."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 9:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 1
Location: Seattle
I've been eying the Seagate 1.5TB drive since it was released late last summer. But I've also been reading the travails of owners at Seagate's community forum and Newegg customer reviews. It's not worth the risk to me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:01 pm 
Offline
Friend of SPCR

Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 6:14 am
Posts: 1234
Location: Finland
the article wrote:
Thanks to its high areal density, it is also one of the faster 7200 RPM drives out there, at least according to HD Tach. It posted a very high average read speed, high enough to rival the Velociraptor


Obviously increasing platter densities are going to mean increasing sequential read speeds, and that is not the point of Velociraptor.

Velociraptor = a drive that can do 7ms random access. That's the point of Velociraptor. It's not going to get rivaled in that category too soon by any other spinning SATA drive. In fact I think it's not going to get rivalled at all until this use case is totally dominated by SSD drives in the future.

_________________
my general purpose desktop system: HP LP3065 30" LCD 2560x1600 pixels, Q9450, 8GB DDR2 ECC 800MHz, EVGA 460GTX 1GB SC (OC@800MHz/2000MHz), WD Velociraptor 300GB, Samsung 2TB, Gigabyte EX38-DS4, Antec P182b, Corsair VX450, Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme, Scythe S-Flex fan, <90W AC idle, 200W AC gaming


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 204
Location: Italy
Seagate also announced the Barracuda 7200.12 series: http://www.seagate.com/www/en-us/produc ... a_7200.12/

They should be 500 GB per-platter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 1:45 pm
Posts: 310
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
^ Very suspicious that they ship in 250GB, 500GB, 750GB and 1TB capacities. Also they claim upt o 160MB/s sustained on the webpage, but the datasheet says 125...

_________________
Gaming rig: Tt Tsunami,P5Q Pro,Q9450 w Ninja,8GB RAM,4870 1GB w S1,WD 640GB,SB X-Fi Plat,ZM-MFC2.Kama PWM in PSU,others S-FlexEs.
HTPC: NSK2480,GB GF9400,E5200 w/ Minja,4GB RAM,WD GP 1.5TB,Nova DVB-S. Minja PSU fan,S-FlexEs case fans.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 3:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:49 pm
Posts: 305
Location: Sweden
I don't get it, the noise levels are 6 dB lower than WD black, is it really that much more quiet or did you test en drive in that fancy chamber of yours and one at some other place? I would like to se it compared to the GP you previously reviewed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 10:59 pm
Posts: 157
Location: San Diego, CA
hybrid2d4x4 wrote:
^ Very suspicious that they ship in 250GB, 500GB, 750GB and 1TB capacities. Also they claim upt o 160MB/s sustained on the webpage, but the datasheet says 125...

Not suspicious at all - drive manufactures have been shipping disks which only use one side of a platter for ages - I suspect that they take platters which have defects on only one side and use those as single-sided platters rather than throw them in the circular file.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 7:33 pm 
Offline
SPCR Reviewer

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 9:07 pm
Posts: 1009
Location: Vancouver
bozar wrote:
I don't get it, the noise levels are 6 dB lower than WD black, is it really that much more quiet or did you test en drive in that fancy chamber of yours and one at some other place? I would like to se it compared to the GP you previously reviewed.


All the drives listed on the comparison table were tested in the chamber. We don't have a GP to re-test atm.

I suggest you listen to the recordings for a better sense of the noise level difference.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 1:45 pm
Posts: 310
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
drees wrote:
Not suspicious at all - drive manufactures have been shipping disks which only use one side of a platter for ages - I suspect that they take platters which have defects on only one side and use those as single-sided platters rather than throw them in the circular file.


Thanks for the explanation, I actually haven't heard that before. I previously assumed that if a platter was going to have enough defects on one side to call it a write-off, odds are the other side isn't in much better shape (ie: good enough to use).

_________________
Gaming rig: Tt Tsunami,P5Q Pro,Q9450 w Ninja,8GB RAM,4870 1GB w S1,WD 640GB,SB X-Fi Plat,ZM-MFC2.Kama PWM in PSU,others S-FlexEs.
HTPC: NSK2480,GB GF9400,E5200 w/ Minja,4GB RAM,WD GP 1.5TB,Nova DVB-S. Minja PSU fan,S-FlexEs case fans.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 11:03 pm
Posts: 32
Is there really any point in reviewing disk based storage anymore?

With all the wonderful SSD options out there (Intel, Mtron and maybe the new models from OCZ to name a few) I can't see what the point is for SPCR spending time on the noisy & warm HDD options.

Sure, it is cheaper. But this forum is all about noise, not price. (Correct me if I'm wrong on this point)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 6:55 am
Posts: 5085
Location: UK
tha_lode wrote:
Is there really any point in reviewing disk based storage anymore?

With all the wonderful SSD options out there (Intel, Mtron and maybe the new models from OCZ to name a few) I can't see what the point is for SPCR spending time on the noisy & warm HDD options.

Sure, it is cheaper. But this forum is all about noise, not price. (Correct me if I'm wrong on this point)


2.5" hard disks offer a very good compromise between noise and cost/GB. Not all of us are millionaires, and have substantial storage requirements, where SSDs are still inadequate.

_________________
JFK:
What do our opponents mean when they apply to us the label "Liberal?" If by "Liberal" they mean...someone who looks ahead, who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions,who cares about the welfare of the people, who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad...then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 5:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 11:03 pm
Posts: 32
I just think that having a server w lots of space on traditional HDDs hidden away where noise isn't a problem, and a small SSD w the just the OS on the computer I use is a better solution.

A small SSD is not that expensive either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 8:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:00 am
Posts: 17
Location: UK
tha_lode wrote:
Is there really any point in reviewing disk based storage anymore?

With all the wonderful SSD options out there (Intel, Mtron and maybe the new models from OCZ to name a few) I can't see what the point is for SPCR spending time on the noisy & warm HDD options.

Sure, it is cheaper. But this forum is all about noise, not price. (Correct me if I'm wrong on this point)


I'd say there is always a trade off. price vs performance vs noise. and thats why there is still a point to these reviews.

so me - I'm upgrading my server storage box, looking for a new big drive. and its sits in my office where I can hear it. I have been using samsung spinpoints (have 1x500G, 2x1T) to date, looking to see if the competition has caught up. So noise is still an issue for a 3.5" drive. hence why I read this review.

in my htpc in the tv room I currently have a 3.5" (which I'm finding too noisy), about to change for a 2.5" and put the 3.5" in the office server.
the htpc might become an SSD eventually when prices drop more. right now, SSD is too much money for the size. One that will hold my base OS and no more is over 100GBP. I can't buy one big enough to hold my media without selling my house :lol:

so for me - silence/performance/price of storage of all drive types is still very much relevant.

Ian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:45 am 
Offline
Patron of SPCR

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:05 am
Posts: 744
Location: London
tha_lode wrote:
A small SSD is not that expensive either.

The cheapest SSD's arent too expesnive sure, but they have pretty poor performance and are slower than the latest HDD's in many tasks. At the moment you need to go pretty high end SSD's to get a decent improvement across the field comapred to the best mechanical drives, and at that point its not good value for money.
For a silence and cooling POV cheap SSD's are good, but still i dont think paying 10x the $/GB is worth saving ~5w.

_________________
I have no signature!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 5:35 pm
Posts: 282
Location: In the Palace
tha_lode wrote:
I just think that having a server w lots of space on traditional HDDs hidden away where noise isn't a problem, and a small SSD w the just the OS on the computer I use is a better solution.

A small SSD is not that expensive either.


I have 2 rooms in my aparment, a living- and a bedroom. Where would you propose I put this server?

good gbit switches/routers are expensive too

_________________
Antec P182 | Seasonic S12II-380W | Asus EAH3450/HTP/512M
Asus M3A-H/HDMI | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4850E @ +5% | Ninja Rev B
Sony-NEC AD-7200S & Lite On LH-20A1H | Samsung HD501LJ & 4x F1 1TB.
Toshiba Satellite 1900-102.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 11:03 pm
Posts: 32
uhm... hanging outside the window? ;-)

Okay, I see your point.

(I put mine in the basement.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:29 pm 
Offline
Friend of SPCR

Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 6:48 am
Posts: 717
Location: San Francisco, CA
I just got a couple of the 1TB 3 platter 7200.11 models, (one which has much newer firmware and one which has updated firmware), looks like they're as quiet as advertised. I still had a couple old 7200.10's and the noise difference is absolutely amazing. The 7200.11 that were unmounted and outside were still way quieter than the 7200.10's inside my case. My guess is the drives are still louder than any fan, but now it's a lot harder to tell. Unfortunately there is some loss of access speed, but I think a couple ms of extra access time is worth the silence. Sounds like the 7200.12 drives have the same access time issue as well.

_________________
Quiet Wuv Wizzie
Main: I5-3570K at 3.7ghz, 16GB DDR-1600@1.35v, Asrock Z77 Extreme6, Corsair 330R, Seasonic 760XP2, Sapphire Radeon 7950| Secondary/Lan: Core i3-2100, 4GB, Msi H67MA-E35, Radeon 6790, Sugo SG02| HTPC: Core i3-2100, 4GB, AsRock H67M-ITX/HT, Antec ISK300-65| NAS: Core I3-2100, 8GB, Antec TP-550, Lian Li PC-Q08B, 4X2TB WD Green| Lappy: Latitude D620 Core 2 T7600, Quadro NVS 110M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 12:15 pm 
Offline
*Lifetime Patron*

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:44 pm
Posts: 336
Location: San Jose, CA
Well I got one of these drives for a new system im putting together and found the thing runs Very Hot.

Granted it wasnt in a case, but just sitting on my desk for bench testing -- Tthe drive became almost too hot to touch while it was formatting.

Anyone know if this is normal?

-- yes im planning on putting it in a case with cooling and such, but if it gets this hot in such a short time im worried i may have to reorganize things to have a dedicated fan.

_________________
1: Asus P6X58D, i7 980x (stock), GTX285 2gb (stock), 12GB ram
2: Tyan k8we, SC742S-B case, 2x Opteron 280, GTX210 (stock), 6GB ram, 2x zalman cps9700 - no fan, Sythe ultra-kaze
3: Thinkpad T500


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:48 pm 
Offline
Friend of SPCR

Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 6:48 am
Posts: 717
Location: San Francisco, CA
kittle wrote:
Well I got one of these drives for a new system im putting together and found the thing runs Very Hot.

Granted it wasnt in a case, but just sitting on my desk for bench testing -- Tthe drive became almost too hot to touch while it was formatting.

Anyone know if this is normal?

-- yes im planning on putting it in a case with cooling and such, but if it gets this hot in such a short time im worried i may have to reorganize things to have a dedicated fan.


I'm surprised about the hotness. My 7200.11 1tb's are actually 5 degrees less than my old 7200.10 4 platter(which btw is way way louder). Not sure if it's normal or not. I guess it's possible that the 4 platter 7200.11 is a bit hotter. I was getting temps around 33-34 degrees inside my case. Outside I'd expect a bit worse as there's no moving air.

_________________
Quiet Wuv Wizzie
Main: I5-3570K at 3.7ghz, 16GB DDR-1600@1.35v, Asrock Z77 Extreme6, Corsair 330R, Seasonic 760XP2, Sapphire Radeon 7950| Secondary/Lan: Core i3-2100, 4GB, Msi H67MA-E35, Radeon 6790, Sugo SG02| HTPC: Core i3-2100, 4GB, AsRock H67M-ITX/HT, Antec ISK300-65| NAS: Core I3-2100, 8GB, Antec TP-550, Lian Li PC-Q08B, 4X2TB WD Green| Lappy: Latitude D620 Core 2 T7600, Quadro NVS 110M


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSNbot Media and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group