Viewing page 1 of 6 pages.
1 2 3 4 5 6 NextIntel's Q9550S: A Greener Quad Core?
June 22, 2009 by Lawrence Lee
| Product |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550S
LGA775 Processor |
| Manufacturer |
Intel |
| Street Price |
US$335~$360 |
The high-end desktop processor market is saturated with products
that use a lot of energy. The fastest, Intel's Core
i7s, all have thermal envelopes of 130W. AMD's highest-clocked Phenom II quad
cores are rated for 125W, while most Intel
Core 2 Quads are rated for 95W. Intel is in a enviable position with a sizable
lead in performance at the very top, and energy efficient alternatives to rival
the best AMD has to offer.
Enter Intel's Q9550S, Q9400S, Q8400S, and Q8200S, 65W variants of some of the
existing Core 2 Quad line. Rather than ramp up the performance of their Core
2 Quads (which would eat into their Core i7 and future Core i5 profits), Intel
has taken a page from AMD's book, releasing more energy efficient chips.
AMD brands their energy efficient chips with an "E" at the end of
their model numbers, while Intel has decided to use "S."
|
Comparison Table: Current Intel Core 2 Quad Lineup
|
|
Model
|
Clock Speed
|
Total L2 Cache
|
TDP
|
Mfg.
Price
|
Best Online Price
|
|
Q9650
|
3.00 GHz
|
12MB
|
95W
|
$316
|
$320
|
|
Q9550S
|
2.83 GHz
|
12MB
|
65W
|
$320
|
$335
|
|
Q9550
|
2.83 GHz
|
12MB
|
95W
|
$266
|
$220
|
|
Q9400S
|
2.66 GHz
|
6MB
|
65W
|
$277
|
$287
|
|
Q9400
|
2.66 GHz
|
6MB
|
95W
|
$213
|
$214
|
|
Q8400S
|
2.66 GHz
|
4MB
|
65W
|
$245
|
N/A
|
|
Q8400
|
2.66 GHz
|
4MB
|
95W
|
$183
|
$174
|
|
Q8300
|
2.50 GHz
|
4MB
|
95W
|
$183
|
$190
|
|
Q8200S
|
2.33 GHz
|
4MB
|
65W
|
$183
|
$236
|
|
Q8200
|
2.33 GHz
|
4MB
|
95W
|
$163
|
$160
|
|
|
A 30W drop in power is nothing to sneeze at, especially for a high performance
chip like the Q9550 that's likely to be put to good use on demanding applications.
Lower power consumption has obvious benefits, namely a reduction in operating
cost, but from silent computing perspective, a lower power processor puts out
less heat, making it easier to cool quietly. A 65W Core 2 Quad would be a better
choice for a small form factor system where performance
cannot be sacrificed yet cooling is not optimal. The "S" versions do come with a heavy price
premium, though. Currently, the slower model S processors
retail for $75 more than their 95W counterparts. For the Q9550S, the difference
is $115.
|

Our Q9550S sample.
|
| Help support this site, buy the Intel Core 2 Q9550 Quad Core Processor from one of our affiliate retailers! |
|