Search found 147 matches
- Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:18 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: x264 video encoding benchmark
- Replies: 43
- Views: 27781
- Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:38 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: x264 video encoding benchmark
- Replies: 43
- Views: 27781
- Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:53 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: x264 video encoding benchmark
- Replies: 43
- Views: 27781
- Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:29 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: Q6600 owners... what is your VID?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11572
- Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:29 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: Q6600 owners... what is your VID?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11572
Okay all, this will be the final update; please don't post new VID data. I'm not totally sure the integrity of the data collected is that high. What I mean by that is I have read several reports of different reported VIDs for the same chip on different boards. I have also read about the VID changing...
- Thu Sep 20, 2007 1:41 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: x264 video encoding benchmark
- Replies: 43
- Views: 27781
As of 20-Sep-2007, we have data on over 100 Intel-based systems and on over 40 AMD-based systems. There are a few trends I picked-up on while browsing through the database. I put them into a single table and color coded them to make them easier to see. If you see a trend I missed, lemme know and I'l...
- Sun Sep 16, 2007 7:52 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: x264 video encoding benchmark
- Replies: 43
- Views: 27781
- Sun Sep 16, 2007 4:35 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: x264 video encoding benchmark
- Replies: 43
- Views: 27781
- Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:26 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: x264 video encoding benchmark
- Replies: 43
- Views: 27781
Re: I fell asleep
...but, the program kept running. X2 4400, 2 GB DDR400 dual channel, 6150 chipset and XP 32 bit stock clocked Cool man, thanks for the results. Can you report your mem timings and final mem core rate (i.e. 5-5-5-15 @ 400 MHz) Also who makes your motherboard? I never heard of a 6150 chipset. Thanks!
- Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:34 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: x264 video encoding benchmark
- Replies: 43
- Views: 27781
- Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:11 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: x264 video encoding benchmark
- Replies: 43
- Views: 27781
- Tue Sep 11, 2007 12:09 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: x264 video encoding benchmark
- Replies: 43
- Views: 27781
- Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:21 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: x264 video encoding benchmark
- Replies: 43
- Views: 27781
If you don't have AVISynth 2.5.7 on your machine, you'll need to install it before running the benchmark. what happens if you have a diff version of avs installed? and when I already have a version of dgindex.dll in my avs plugins? no id which version. I believe if the version you have is older, th...
- Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:20 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: x264 video encoding benchmark
- Replies: 43
- Views: 27781
Core 2 Duo E6600 (2.4GHz, 4MB) @ 3326 (475 x 7), 2x1GB DDR2 950 5,5,5,15 dual channel, Asus P5B-E Plus P965 motherboard. (WD 5000AAKS, ATi X1950pro, etc etc) Vista Home Premium 32bit Thanks for the result. What is your mem clocked @ (like 475 MHz or ...?) Also, would you be willing to run the same ...
- Sat Sep 08, 2007 5:42 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: x264 video encoding benchmark
- Replies: 43
- Views: 27781
x264 video encoding benchmark
I put together a self-contained x264 video encoding benchmark. Techarp kindly agreed to host the file and results at this URL. Basically, you run the test encode and it will report back frames-per-second values for your machine @ it's clock/overclock level. You can run it at your stock settings and ...
- Sat Aug 25, 2007 12:32 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: Q6600 owners... what is your VID?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11572
- Sun Aug 19, 2007 1:29 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: Q6600 owners... what is your VID?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11572
- Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:54 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: HOWTO: Overclock C2Q & C2D - A Guide v1.7
- Replies: 14
- Views: 9770
@jag: that does seem high, but I checked and indeed, TH's article shows those values.
- Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:03 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: HOWTO: Overclock C2Q & C2D - A Guide v1.7
- Replies: 14
- Views: 9770
- Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:02 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: 9x333, 8x375, or 7x428 on a Q6600 - Which is faster?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3309
I don't know about real-world apps, but WinRAR, for example, reeeeally likes memory bandwidth in its internal benchmark. Look at this thread . I agree that the internal benchmark scores faster, but you have to take your disk access time into account since you won't be running winrar in benchmark mo...
- Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:19 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: HOWTO: Overclock C2Q & C2D - A Guide v1.7
- Replies: 14
- Views: 9770
HOWTO: Overclock C2Q & C2D - A Guide v1.7
Edited on 08-Jun-2008 : Guide is now version 1.7 – added a 2nd example minimizing the vcores on my system. Before you continue, I wrote this guide with the newbie in mind, so please don't reply criticizing it for being too simplistic -- it's this way by design. Also know that the steps for overcl...
- Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:19 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: 9x333, 8x375, or 7x428 on a Q6600 - Which is faster?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3309
9x333, 8x375, or 7x428 on a Q6600 - Which is faster?
What is a better overclock? Good question. Most people believe that a higher FSB and lower multiplier are better since this maximizes the bandwidth on the FSB. Or is a low bus rate and higher multiplier better? Or is there no difference? I looked at three different settings on my Q6600: 9x333 = 3.0...
- Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:43 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: q6600 g0 owners - what is your min. stable vcore @ 9x333?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3558
Thanks dude, but that's the thread I startedsmilingcrow wrote:Try this link for data on VID values for G0 and B3 steppings.
- Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:23 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: q6600 g0 owners - what is your min. stable vcore @ 9x333?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3558
q6600 g0 owners - what is your min. stable vcore @ 9x333?
Topic says it all. I'm only interested in your vcore @ 9x333 if you own a g0 Q6600 and you minimized the vcore and if it's stable to 2x orthos or prime95 v25.3 for over say 4 hours. It would also be cool to see your VID as reported in coretemp. So I guess I'd like to see two things: 1) Your minimize...
- Sun Aug 12, 2007 2:01 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: Q6600 owners... what is your VID?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11572
- Sat Aug 11, 2007 11:18 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: Q6600 owners... what is your VID?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11572
- Mon Aug 06, 2007 3:27 pm
- Forum: CPU Cooling
- Topic: lapped my IHS on a Q6600 (pics and results)
- Replies: 16
- Views: 12610
- Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:32 pm
- Forum: CPU Cooling
- Topic: lapped my IHS on a Q6600 (pics and results)
- Replies: 16
- Views: 12610
- Mon Aug 06, 2007 11:21 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: Q6600 owners... what is your VID?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11572
I don't quite know what to make of this whole lower VID = higher o/c potential thing. My chip for example, is a B3 stepping Q6600 w/ a reported VID of 1.2875V (coretemp), yet I can run 9x266 (stock) which is stable to 2x orthos for over 8 hours (I stopped it after 8 hours) @ 1.1375V in the BIOS whic...
- Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:58 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: Q6600 owners... what is your VID?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11572