Oh no! A nightmare motherboard from Abit...!
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
-
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 12:44 pm
- Location: UK
Oh no! A nightmare motherboard from Abit...!
http://www.abit-usa.com/products/mb/pro ... &model=262
Five, that's FIVE onboard fans before you've even put the heatsink on. Arrrgh!
*runs a mile*
Five, that's FIVE onboard fans before you've even put the heatsink on. Arrrgh!
*runs a mile*
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Salisbury, UK
-
- SPCR Reviewer
- Posts: 8636
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 6:33 am
- Location: Sunny SoCal
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:40 am
I hope they are not as bad as the NB fan I could hear that one little fan in another room. It really is not a bad idea for overclockers but if history repeats they dont use the best fans no one can stand those for long. I am actualy thinking of some of the same cooling but with quiet fans and ducting.
Why do they bother? I thought that the evidence was fairly conclusive on the subject of deliberate main memory cooling i.e. it just isn't necessary. And those bloody little 40mm screamers are so unreliable, you'd think that board manufacturers would finally realise that it's easier just to use big passive heatsinks. Sigh.
What's the betting that the fans will crap out after six months and turn out to be impossible to replace?
What's the betting that the fans will crap out after six months and turn out to be impossible to replace?
Why even ask that question? It's all about benchmarketing [sic]. Any old bullshit can be pushed onto the market. It's the old "solution looking for a problem" that is solved by meaningless advertising convincing people they need some worthless product.Denorios wrote:Why do they bother? I thought that the evidence was fairly conclusive on the subject of deliberate main memory cooling i.e. it just isn't necessary. And those bloody little 40mm screamers are so unreliable, you'd think that board manufacturers would finally realise that it's easier just to use big passive heatsinks. Sigh.
I just hoped Abit would steer clear of that sort of thing. They've managed to do so in the past. And this particular piece of bullshit is so big that you wonder what they were thinking of. Overclockers may know bugger all about silencing, but they usually know their cooling quite well. This is so transparent it's unbelievable.ckolivas wrote:Why even ask that question? It's all about benchmarketing [sic]. Any old bullshit can be pushed onto the market. It's the old "solution looking for a problem" that is solved by meaningless advertising convincing people they need some worthless product.
Market forces
Perhaps the overclockers actually asked for that nonsense?
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:40 am
Re: Market forces
Not as absurd as it might seem it is a whole diffrent world for some many have one computer to use and one to overclock for benches.ckolivas wrote:Perhaps the overclockers actually asked for that nonsense?
Take a look at this guys MB and all the fans he has on it I am sure he is not done
http://img172.exs.cx/img172/5128/img1548small7fd.jpg
With certan specal memory you need to run it to 3.2V or greater and a fan on the memory is pretty much required at high volts. Of corce no boards except DFI can run this much voltage stock so mods are required.
Of coirse to kids loud means fast just look at the fart pipes on ricers real overclocking has nothing to do with this. It should sale well.....and make a lot of converts to silent computing later.
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Salisbury, UK