Western Digital Raptor 150GB: New Revision, New Noise?

Want to talk about one of the articles in SPCR? Here's the forum for you.
Post Reply
Devonavar
SPCR Reviewer
Posts: 1850
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:23 am
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

Western Digital Raptor 150GB: New Revision, New Noise?

Post by Devonavar » Sat Jun 24, 2006 5:15 pm


NeilBlanchard
Moderator
Posts: 7674
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
Contact:

Post by NeilBlanchard » Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:44 am

Hello Devon,

The thickness of the material around the main bearing hub (on the bottom of the unit) does appear to be more substantial on the new version -- maybe this is why it has lower idle noise?
Sincerely, Neil
http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/

rpsgc
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 1630
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 1:59 am
Location: Portugal

Post by rpsgc » Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:58 am

Perhaps the new 74GB Raptor also benefits from lower idle noise but lower seek noise?
Fractal Define R4 | Corsair AX750 | MSI Z97 Gaming 5 | Intel Core i7 4770K w/TRUE 120 Rev. C | 16GB G.Skill Sniper DDR3-1866 | Sapphire Nitro+ RX 480 8GB OC | Crucial m4 128GB + Crucial MX100 512GB + WD Blue 1TB + WD Red 4TB | JVC HA-RX900 | Dell U2312HM + BenQ G2400WD | Asus Echelon Mechanical Keyboard | Logitech G400s

ryboto
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 1439
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: New Hampshire, US
Contact:

Post by ryboto » Mon Jun 26, 2006 10:54 am

I own the new revision, and I can attest to the loud seeks. I've also got a WD 320gb, KS revision, same as the recently reviewed 500gb. Seeks are barely audible from the 320gb drive, whereas the raptor is very noticeable. I can tolerate it, as idle noise is incredibly low, and when I do access the drive I'm usually playing a song, or using my headset for a game. This combination of drives is the first I've had that emit practically no whine, at least none that I can hear. The raptor does seem to get hot though. I've got a fan at 600rpm blowing at it, and it stays at 43C as monitored by Speedfan. Oddly, speedfan doesn't detect the 320gb drive..
[url=http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=userpage&teamnum=31574&username=rybot][email protected][/url]
[url=http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=36172&highlight=][size=75]Oldest Setup[/url]
[url=http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=48778]Old[/url]
i5-750 | TR AXP-140 | DFI MI P55-T36 | Lan-Gear mITX | HD5850 | Silverstone ST45SF[/size]

Goldmember
Posts: 220
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 10:16 am
Location: U.S.A.

Post by Goldmember » Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:01 pm

I find it amazing that a 10,000 rpm drive can have only a 20db idle noise level! Amazing, since a 4,200 rpm drive in the old days could make your ears bleed. :)

However, after listening to the mp3, seeks are a little too rough for my taste.

qviri
Posts: 2465
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: Berlin
Contact:

Post by qviri » Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:16 pm

It seems as though Western Digital is getting in the quiet game. First the very quiet 500 gigger, now this - seeks notwithstanding, I betcha with 7200 rpm and AAM those seeks would be comparable to a P120. Samsung needs to start playing catch-up. Customers win :D
Thinkpad X200 – aging fan, T60p – Core Duo whine :(
Nothing endures but change

JazzJackRabbit
Posts: 1386
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 6:53 pm

Post by JazzJackRabbit » Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:31 pm

I think it's time you guys switch to "two distance" noise recording we talked earlier. Up close, the new raptor sounds horrible, so much high pitched noise. :evil: The db numbers tell us one thing, but when I listen to noise recordings, there is no way I can perceive raptor as quieter than P80/P120. I don't think you should do away with the current 3" recording distance either, but do two instead. 3" to hear all the details, the noise character and 0.5-0.75m one so that we could hear what the drive would sound in real life situation.

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12283
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by MikeC » Mon Jun 26, 2006 4:18 pm

JazzJackRabbit wrote:I think it's time you guys switch to "two distance" noise recording we talked earlier. Up close, the new raptor sounds horrible, so much high pitched noise. :evil: The db numbers tell us one thing, but when I listen to noise recordings, there is no way I can perceive raptor as quieter than P80/P120. I don't think you should do away with the current 3" recording distance either, but do two instead. 3" to hear all the details, the noise character and 0.5-0.75m one so that we could hear what the drive would sound in real life situation.
We're moving in that direction. More in the next review, and probably some new recordings of reference products.
Mike Chin, SPCR Editor/Publisher
Support SPCR by buying your gear through this link: Amazon

JazzJackRabbit
Posts: 1386
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 6:53 pm

Post by JazzJackRabbit » Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:22 pm

MikeC wrote:We're moving in that direction. More in the next review, and probably some new recordings of reference products.
That's great news, can't wait for new sound samples, although it means more work for you :twisted:

josephclemente
Posts: 580
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: USA (Phoenix, AZ)

Post by josephclemente » Mon Jun 26, 2006 10:03 pm

I have been very happy with my 150GB Raptor. I was expecting seeks to be much louder but was pleasantly surprised. Then of course there is the speed... :)
SilverStone SG05, Antec Kuhler H2O 620, Scythe Gentle Typhoon AP-13 120MM, Seasonic X-460, ASRock Z77E-ITX, Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2, Samsung 30nm 1.35V 8GB DDR3 1600 RAM, PowerColor AX7750, Samsung Series 830 256GB SSD, Win 7 Ultimate x64
Link

Erssa
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 9:26 pm
Location: Finland

Post by Erssa » Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:08 am

JazzJackRabbit wrote:I think it's time you guys switch to "two distance" noise recording we talked earlier. Up close, the new raptor sounds horrible, so much high pitched noise. :evil: The db numbers tell us one thing, but when I listen to noise recordings, there is no way I can perceive raptor as quieter than P80/P120. I don't think you should do away with the current 3" recording distance either, but do two instead. 3" to hear all the details, the noise character and 0.5-0.75m one so that we could hear what the drive would sound in real life situation.
Maybe you have bad sample? When I bought my Raptor, I did a close comparison between with my P80 and my raptor, to me they both were really silent even from close distance. The raptor had a higher pitch, but nothing I would describe as horrible.

I was actually a bit suprised to see that the seek noises are so loud in the test. I guess it shows that case dampening helps to quieten down hard drives.
[color=blue][size=84]Antec Solo case /w Seasonic S-12 430W, Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-SH2, X2 4850e /w Scythe Ninja, 2x2Gb DDR2800, WD Raptor 150GB, 500GB WD GP in Antec MX-1, BenQ G2400W, Logitech diNovo Laser, Logitech z-680[/color][/size]

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12283
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by MikeC » Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:24 am

JazzJackRabbit wrote:
MikeC wrote:We're moving in that direction. More in the next review, and probably some new recordings of reference products.
That's great news, can't wait for new sound samples, although it means more work for you :twisted:
I have to say, however, that the quality of your own PC sound playback system is extremely important; it probably affects what you hear from these recordings more than anything else. If you know you don't have a very good playback system, then I'd say improve it before you tell us our recordings are no good.
Mike Chin, SPCR Editor/Publisher
Support SPCR by buying your gear through this link: Amazon

smilingcrow
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 1809
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 1:45 am
Location: At Home

Post by smilingcrow » Tue Jun 27, 2006 7:12 am

ryboto wrote:The raptor does seem to get hot though. I've got a fan at 600rpm blowing at it, and it stays at 43C as monitored by Speedfan. Oddly, speedfan doesn't detect the 320gb drive..
I’ve also noticed that Speedfan has problems with monitoring multiple hard drives if that's what you are implying here. I use DTemp to monitor drive temps. It doesn’t interact with fan speeds though, so maybe somebody can recommend a program that can monitor multiple drives and control fan speeds.

JazzJackRabbit
Posts: 1386
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 6:53 pm

Post by JazzJackRabbit » Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:12 am

Erssa wrote:
JazzJackRabbit wrote:I think it's time you guys switch to "two distance" noise recording we talked earlier. Up close, the new raptor sounds horrible, so much high pitched noise. :evil: The db numbers tell us one thing, but when I listen to noise recordings, there is no way I can perceive raptor as quieter than P80/P120. I don't think you should do away with the current 3" recording distance either, but do two instead. 3" to hear all the details, the noise character and 0.5-0.75m one so that we could hear what the drive would sound in real life situation.
Maybe you have bad sample? When I bought my Raptor, I did a close comparison between with my P80 and my raptor, to me they both were really silent even from close distance. The raptor had a higher pitch, but nothing I would describe as horrible.

I was actually a bit suprised to see that the seek noises are so loud in the test. I guess it shows that case dampening helps to quieten down hard drives.
Bold part highlighted, I was referring to SPCR noise recordings.

MikeC wrote:I have to say, however, that the quality of your own PC sound playback system is extremely important; it probably affects what you hear from these recordings more than anything else. If you know you don't have a very good playback system, then I'd say improve it before you tell us our recordings are no good.
Where did I tell you that your recordings are no good? They are good, as we have discussed before in WD500 thread, they portray overal drive noise signature quite accurately, however they cannot be used to compare relative loudness of any two hard drives. And for the record I do have a decent system: E-MU 1212M > MisterX PPA w/steps and diamond buffers > HD-600. It's not a multi-thousand dollar system, but it's good bang for the buck and is more than plenty for SPCR noise samples evaluation purposes... :twisted:

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12283
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by MikeC » Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:51 am

JazzJackRabbit wrote:Where did I tell you that your recordings are no good? They are good, as we have discussed before in WD500 thread, they portray overal drive noise signature quite accurately, however they cannot be used to compare relative loudness of any two hard drives. And for the record I do have a decent system: E-MU 1212M > MisterX PPA w/steps and diamond buffers > HD-600. It's not a multi-thousand dollar system, but it's good bang for the buck and is more than plenty for SPCR noise samples evaluation purposes... :twisted:
Fair enuf. :wink:
Mike Chin, SPCR Editor/Publisher
Support SPCR by buying your gear through this link: Amazon

webdev511
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:42 am
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Post by webdev511 » Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:12 am

I've got one of these mounted in my P180.

It does have more seek noise than the Seagate 7200.8 I was using as hda0, but only noticably so when doing read/writes for an extended period of time, like boot up, or loading my developement tools and database.

It's a great workstation hard drive, and if given the choice, I would buy it again.
Garth H
San Jose, CA
MCITP

Shining Arcanine
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 2:02 pm

Post by Shining Arcanine » Wed Jun 28, 2006 10:05 am

Is there any possibility of getting samples of 1, 2 and 3 platter Caviars from Western Digital for review?

Post Reply