5900rpm Seagate Hard Drives: Barracuda LP, Pipeline HD .2

Want to talk about one of the articles in SPCR? Here's the forum for you.
Post Reply
MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12283
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

5900rpm Seagate Hard Drives: Barracuda LP, Pipeline HD .2

Post by MikeC » Sun Oct 11, 2009 1:43 pm

Mike Chin, SPCR Editor/Publisher
Support SPCR by buying your gear through this link: Amazon

dhanson865
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:20 am
Location: TN, USA

Post by dhanson865 » Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:09 pm

I wish the Pipeline and LP models weren't so closely compared. I'm afraid some casual skimming type readers will assume the LP series as a whole will behave the same as the 4 platter 2TB Barracuda LP.

It's worth noting that the 1.5 TB Barracuda LP still uses 4 platters and has the same noise profile as the 2TB Barracuda LP. http://www.seagate.com/staticfiles/supp ... 64361c.pdf

The 1 TB Barracuda LP is a much better compromise on power and noise as it uses 2 less platters.

Code: Select all

Table 3:   DC power requirements
Power dissipation (2TB and 1.5TB models)   Avg (watts 25° C)
Idle*                                      4.3
Operating (average)                        6.8
Standby                                    0.5
Sleep                                      0.5

Power dissipation (1TB models)             Avg (watts 25° C)
Idle*                                      3.0
Operating (average)                        5.7
Standby                                    0.321
Sleep                                      0.321

Code: Select all

Table 4: Drive A-weighted Sound Power Levels (SWL, BA)
                      Idle[1]         Seek profile
2TB and 1.5TB model   2.5 bels (typ)  2.6 bels (typ)
                      2.6 bels (max)  2.8 bels (max)

1TB model             1.9 bels (typ)  2.0 bels (typ)
                      2.1 bels (max)  2.2 bels (max)
I'd steer clear of that 1.5 TB model as it is the worst of both worlds.
.
Please put a country in your profile if you haven't already.
This site is international but I'll assume you are in the US if you don't tell me otherwise.
RAID levels thread http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=388987

Olle P
Posts: 659
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:03 am
Location: Sweden

Post by Olle P » Mon Oct 12, 2009 1:59 am

What strikes me is the numbers for seek/read/write performance...
Seagate claims the 2TB disk is worse of the bunch, whereas the test shows the 2TB to be the fastest and the 0.5TB the worst.
The latter fits snugly into my own theory that more platters/heads improve performance when all other factors are the same, since it allows more parallel read/write.

(Obviously it's better with fewer platters/heads from a low noise perspective.)

Cheers
Olle

NeilBlanchard
Moderator
Posts: 7680
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
Contact:

Post by NeilBlanchard » Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:39 am

Hi,

I think this is the 500GB model at NewEgg for $65 plus shipping:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6822148488

They do not list the RPM, but it looks to be the slim case in the pictures. Is this the same drive?

Here's the 1TB version for $80 with free shipping:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6822148411

And the 2TB version for $180 with free shipping:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6822148413

I've had the 2TB model for about a month now, and it has been fine so far. It is in an external case, and it is slightly less quiet than my 24" iMac at idle, and seeks are audible -- but it is sitting on its edge on the tabletop which is going to "reveal" the seek noises because the motion of the heads are perpendicular to the tabletop.
Sincerely, Neil
http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/

bozar
Posts: 305
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:49 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by bozar » Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:50 am

Great review as always, the comparison with WD GP made it a lot harder to choose though. A two-platter 1 TB WD GP should be a bit more quiet compared to the 2 TB model, right? 500 GB is a bit to little for me me, otherwise the Pipeline HD .2 would be on my "to buy list".

Shamgar
Posts: 454
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 8:49 am
Location: Where I Am

Post by Shamgar » Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:04 am

Samsung F2 EG is better value with better availability where I live. Best current prices locally were AU$66 for 500GB and $89 for 1TB. I ended up buying the 1TB. WD and Seagate 1TBs usually around $100. I've almost given up deciphering WD's models and submodel variants. I want to believe in Seagate again, as I have fond memories of their drives from times past. Yes, it's an emotional thing. The AAM patent issue was a shame. Good to see they are focusing on quiet drives again. Sadly, most vendors here don't seem to want to stock the low power Seagates. Yet WD GPs are everywhere. Don't know what their strategies are sometimes. Could be due to availability. Although sometimes it's difficult for the average uninformed consumer as many vendors still refuse to advertise lower spinning drives at their actual speed and catalog everything under 3.5" desktop 7200RPM.

For your interest, Seagate recently gave WD a serve. Gotta chuckle. The Big Fish is back. Fancy fish Caviar better watch out.

bendit
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 3:43 pm
Location: san francisco ca

Post by bendit » Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:36 pm

NeilBlanchard wrote:Hi,

I think this is the 500GB model at NewEgg for $65 plus shipping:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6822148488

They do not list the RPM, but it looks to be the slim case in the pictures. Is this the same drive?

Here's the 1TB version for $80 with free shipping:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6822148411

And the 2TB version for $180 with free shipping:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6822148413

I've had the 2TB model for about a month now, and it has been fine so far. It is in an external case, and it is slightly less quiet than my 24" iMac at idle, and seeks are audible -- but it is sitting on its edge on the tabletop which is going to "reveal" the seek noises because the motion of the heads are perpendicular to the tabletop.
i think this is the 500g...model # slightly off

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6822148410

NeilBlanchard
Moderator
Posts: 7680
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
Contact:

Post by NeilBlanchard » Mon Oct 12, 2009 3:34 pm

Thanks, you seem to have found the right one, and the price is much better, too.
Sincerely, Neil
http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/

Kaleid
Posts: 254
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:43 am
Location: Sweden

Post by Kaleid » Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:20 am

dhanson865 wrote: It's worth noting that the 1.5 TB Barracuda LP still uses 4 platters and has the same noise profile as the 2TB Barracuda LP. http://www.seagate.com/staticfiles/supp ... 64361c.pdf

The 1 TB Barracuda LP is a much better compromise on power and noise as it uses 2 less platters.

I'd steer clear of that 1.5 TB model as it is the worst of both worlds.
I can verify this. The 1TB model is much quieter than the 1.5tb model. Anecdotal for sure but..

Another POV on the 2TB LP:
http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/17708
i5 4670k (@4.2), Asus Z87-C, Mugen 2 revB (500rpm), Club 3d 280x with AC S1+ (700+500rpm), 24GB Kingston 1600Mhz, Crucial MX100 512GB SSD, 4TB+3TB WD Green (in softm. Scythe quietdrives), Soundblaster Z, Asus MG279Q, Corsair RM650i, Antec p180 (2x500rpm slipstream)

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12283
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by MikeC » Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:32 am

All dhanson865 is saying is that the 1.5 tb and 2 tb versions of the LP have the same noise signature with 4 platters, while the 1 tb model is quieter, with 2 platters. His PoV is that higher noise is more acceptable with higher capacity. That's not necessarily everyone's perspective. To me, the capacity doesn't matter; if it is "too noisy" I don't care what the capacity is, I won't use it in my desktop PC or anywhere close to me. On the other hand, if it's quiet enough, then higher capacity is a bonus.
Mike Chin, SPCR Editor/Publisher
Support SPCR by buying your gear through this link: Amazon

Kaleid
Posts: 254
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:43 am
Location: Sweden

Post by Kaleid » Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:44 am

I fully agree, which is why I sold the 1.5tB drive :)
i5 4670k (@4.2), Asus Z87-C, Mugen 2 revB (500rpm), Club 3d 280x with AC S1+ (700+500rpm), 24GB Kingston 1600Mhz, Crucial MX100 512GB SSD, 4TB+3TB WD Green (in softm. Scythe quietdrives), Soundblaster Z, Asus MG279Q, Corsair RM650i, Antec p180 (2x500rpm slipstream)

Jay_S
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 713
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Post by Jay_S » Thu Oct 15, 2009 12:36 pm

Thanks for the review.

The 2TB version is very appealing to me. My current server consists of 1TB WD10EADS drives. I plan to skip 1.5's and go straight for capacity doubling when I upgrade. The 2TB Seagate looks like a good choice. The additional performance over the WD drives is icing on the cake. A bit higher startup current draw: 2A for the 2TB Seagate vs 1.759A for the 2TB WD. Have to be careful with the PSU...
it's the only jib I got, baby

sampo
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:56 am
Location: Finland

Post by sampo » Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:59 am

So would a Seagate LP 1TB be a worse choice than WD Green? Does a two platter 1TB WD Green even exist? I mainly care about idle&seek noise.

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12283
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by MikeC » Sat Oct 17, 2009 12:24 pm

sampo wrote:So would a Seagate LP 1TB be a worse choice than WD Green? Does a two platter 1TB WD Green even exist? I mainly care about idle&seek noise.
It seems that the WD GP drives have slightly lower seek noise... although I have to say the differences are small enough that other aspects of your system (including HDD mounting) will probably make more difference. Suspension w/ elastic cord is probably necessary for you.
Mike Chin, SPCR Editor/Publisher
Support SPCR by buying your gear through this link: Amazon

sampo
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:56 am
Location: Finland

Post by sampo » Sat Oct 17, 2009 12:59 pm

Thanks. I guess both drives are fine from acoustical standpoint. Trouble finding the right WD variant and load cycle issues(?) are pointing me towards Seagate.

_MarcoM_
Posts: 294
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:58 am

Post by _MarcoM_ » Thu Nov 26, 2009 10:53 am

I founded a pipeline 500GB HD2 at a good price. But it is 8MB buffer model, and it's the only difference from the one reviewed.

I will use it as a system drive in my rig, Caviar GP will become a backup drive mounted under the Seagate. Should i care about buffer? Should i care about performance? :roll:

dhanson865
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:20 am
Location: TN, USA

Post by dhanson865 » Thu Nov 26, 2009 7:39 pm

If you are talking about the one mentioned in this thread viewtopic.php?t=56436 it has 16MB cache not 8MB and I'd say it's a worth buying if the price is cheap.
.
Please put a country in your profile if you haven't already.
This site is international but I'll assume you are in the US if you don't tell me otherwise.
RAID levels thread http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=388987

_MarcoM_
Posts: 294
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:58 am

Post by _MarcoM_ » Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:41 am

No, i'm talking about the Pipeline hd.2, similar to the model reviewed by SPCR in this article, except the buffer size:
http://www.silentpcreview.com/seagate-5 ... ard-drives

Post Reply