HIS HD 5550 & 5570 "Silence" Graphics Cards

Want to talk about one of the articles in SPCR? Here's the forum for you.
Post Reply
Lawrence Lee
SPCR Reviewer
Posts: 1115
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 9:07 pm
Location: Vancouver

HIS HD 5550 & 5570 "Silence" Graphics Cards

Post by Lawrence Lee » Sat Jul 17, 2010 11:38 pm


netmask254
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 8:51 pm
Location: Beijing, China

Post by netmask254 » Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:10 am

Instead of these not well cooled cards, many silencers pay more attentions to PowerColor's Green Series in recent months. Shall we have a chance to verify them? :wink:

http://www.powercolor.com/Global/produc ... asp?id=214
http://www.powercolor.com/Global/produc ... asp?id=236
http://www.powercolor.com/global/produc ... asp?id=237

Tzupy
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 1560
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:47 am
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Post by Tzupy » Mon Jul 19, 2010 2:08 am

Please correct the title typo. It's not another passive 5750 (unfortunately), but just a 5570.
I think HIS went cheap and they'll lose on these cards. IMO an S2 style cooler (with two heatpipes) would give much lower temps.

DAve_M
Posts: 198
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:58 am
Location: UK

Post by DAve_M » Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:52 am

Yes. And the fins need to run left to right just like on a S2 or S1 as well so that it sits along the airflow path through the case.

Mescalero
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 9:02 am
Location: TU-BS, Germany

Post by Mescalero » Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:32 am

I don't get, why they recommend a 400W power supply for a 40W card? Sure the rest of the system won't need so much power if it matches these "lowly" graphic cards.

Are we going to get a 5770 review or maybe even a shootout between different card coolers anytime soon?

Keep up the good work!

ilovejedd
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 4:14 pm
Location: in the depths of hell

Post by ilovejedd » Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:58 am

Mescalero wrote:I don't get, why they recommend a 400W power supply for a 40W card? Sure the rest of the system won't need so much power if it matches these "lowly" graphic cards.
I think I recall reading a footnote somewhere mentioning the 400W PSU recommendation is based off of a system with a high TDP quad-core CPU + 4 HDD's. They also need to account for low-quality power supplies (whose power ratings are outright lies).

Manufacturers have no idea what components buyers will be using with their graphics cards so they need to cover their bases and recommend higher than necessary.

CA_Steve
Moderator
Posts: 7431
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Location: Monterey Bay, CA

Post by CA_Steve » Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:42 pm

Thanks for the review. Big delta in power use between the ATI reference 5570 and this HIS version. I wonder why?
1080p Gaming build: i5-4670K, Mugen 4, Asrock Z97 Anniversary, MSI GTX 1660 Gaming X, 8GB 1866 RAM, Samsung 860 Evo 500GB, Crucial MX100 256GB, WD Red 2TB, Samsung DVD burner, Fractal Define R4, Antec True Quiet 140 (2 front + rear) case fans, Seasonic SSR-550FX. 35W idle, 45-55W video streaming, 170-200W WoW, 318W stress test (Prime95 + Furmark)

Vibrator
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:46 am
Location: British Columbia

Post by Vibrator » Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:28 pm

CA_Steve wrote:Thanks for the review. Big delta in power use between the ATI reference 5570 and this HIS version. I wonder why?
Maybe the GDDR5 on the HIS

Erelyes
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 12:45 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Erelyes » Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:18 pm

One wonders if a 120mm Nexus/Shiruken/Noctua fan run at 7v or so would drop the temps down significantly? Wouldn't be that hard to jerry-rig a bracket to mount a fan close to the HS on it. I thought the main problem with fans on GPUs was that they were typically 50mm screamers...

Vibrator
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:46 am
Location: British Columbia

Post by Vibrator » Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:44 am

Erelyes wrote:One wonders if a 120mm Nexus/Shiruken/Noctua fan run at 7v or so would drop the temps down significantly? Wouldn't be that hard to jerry-rig a bracket to mount a fan close to the HS on it. I thought the main problem with fans on GPUs was that they were typically 50mm screamers...
Putting a fan on a passive card works wonders.

I put a 70mm 2000RPM fan on my old Geforce 6200 a couple years back, and the temps dropped 20c compared to passive

tay
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 793
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2003 5:56 pm
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Post by tay » Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:58 am

WTF! I use a ZM80D-HP on my 7900GS and it works fine with just a vent over the PCI slots. I just played on a 30C day and it went up to 73C during games. These heatsinks aren't so great in comparison. That being said the HIS 5770 cooling looks better than usual. I wish some of the different 5770 or 50s were reviewed.
Phenom II 555 (3 cores unlocked) 1.275v - 4GB - Xigmatek 1293 Cooler - WD 64 GB SSD -CM Mystique - Antec NeoHE 550 - Saphire 6870
e6300 - 2 GB DDR - P180 - Scythe Mine - Samsung 400 GB - 3 120mm fans
imac 7,1 C2D 2.0, 3 GB 250GB.
macbook C2D 2.4 3 GB 320GB Samsung M7E

kater
Posts: 891
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:20 pm
Location: Poland

Post by kater » Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:16 pm

ilovejedd wrote:
Mescalero wrote:I don't get, why they recommend a 400W power supply for a 40W card? Sure the rest of the system won't need so much power if it matches these "lowly" graphic cards.
I think I recall reading a footnote somewhere mentioning the 400W PSU recommendation is based off of a system with a high TDP quad-core CPU + 4 HDD's. They also need to account for low-quality power supplies (whose power ratings are outright lies).

Manufacturers have no idea what components buyers will be using with their graphics cards so they need to cover their bases and recommend higher than necessary.
And when the maker's legal dept intervenes it seems that a safe margin is calculated as "real power draw in full stress x 8, but no less than 450W for a single card w/o PCI-E 6pin and 600W for a card with 1 PCI-E 6pin".

This is fun, ok, but it gets serious when a review site (say, guru3d) starts recommending 400W PSUs for such cards. And sites like that tend to use massively OCed quad cores... That's when you know that SPCR is THE site.

colm
Posts: 406
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 8:22 am
Location: maine

Post by colm » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:58 pm

so the big gain is 40nm...

all other measurements have been around for 5 years (since the prescott)

..and that is a good point about power needed.
altho 400 is realistic thinking of a modern system, 400 was once recommend for a voodoo and a p2.

today alot more is getting done.

:D

I still want to see one more AGP round go about... in the 45-40nm range.
DSFg$57%udRTYnh

Monkeh16
Posts: 507
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 2:57 pm
Location: England

Post by Monkeh16 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 3:05 pm

colm wrote:I still want to see one more AGP round go about... in the 45-40nm range.
Why? What's the point of supporting a badly designed hack of a bus when PCI-E is available?

Vibrator
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:46 am
Location: British Columbia

Post by Vibrator » Tue Jul 20, 2010 3:29 pm

ilovejedd wrote: They also need to account for low-quality power supplies (whose power ratings are outright lies).
How will they do that?

Low quality power supplies have variances beyond belief.
Some can deliver 80% of their label wattage, while some can only do.....this.
http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?na ... ry&reid=71

IMHO, it is up to the customer to do some research of their own.
If they get burned because they thought a $15 PSU can do 700W, then they have no one to blame but themselves.

CA_Steve
Moderator
Posts: 7431
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Location: Monterey Bay, CA

Post by CA_Steve » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:59 pm

Vibrator wrote:
ilovejedd wrote: They also need to account for low-quality power supplies (whose power ratings are outright lies).
How will they do that?

Low quality power supplies have variances beyond belief.
I think you two are in agreement and just don't realize it :D

The argument goes like this:
NVidia and AMD know that when the user buys a new card, plugs it in, and then the PC goes into a reboot cycle, BSOD, or some other classic PSU load tailspin, it's 50%/50% whether the user blames the card or the PSU. So, that is a HUGE impact on return rates and hence, profitability. By over-rating the heck out of PSU wattage req., they are lessening the chance that a customer (with the most shitty PSU) won't have a PSU problem. Then, they won't get hit by false returns.

So, it's a CYA to lessen their false bad product returns.
1080p Gaming build: i5-4670K, Mugen 4, Asrock Z97 Anniversary, MSI GTX 1660 Gaming X, 8GB 1866 RAM, Samsung 860 Evo 500GB, Crucial MX100 256GB, WD Red 2TB, Samsung DVD burner, Fractal Define R4, Antec True Quiet 140 (2 front + rear) case fans, Seasonic SSR-550FX. 35W idle, 45-55W video streaming, 170-200W WoW, 318W stress test (Prime95 + Furmark)

TalkinHorse
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:28 am
Location: Pasadena, CA

Post by TalkinHorse » Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:11 pm

netmask254 wrote:Instead of these not well cooled cards, many silencers pay more attentions to PowerColor's Green Series in recent months. Shall we have a chance to verify them? :wink:

http://www.powercolor.com/Global/produc ... asp?id=214
http://www.powercolor.com/Global/produc ... asp?id=236
http://www.powercolor.com/global/produc ... asp?id=237
I've got the PowerColor Green 5570 (#237 in the above list; got it from NewEgg), and I'm happy with it. It generally idles below 50 degrees, and high activity may push it into the 60's, but I've never seen it go higher. My PC has steady low to moderate airflow (built to be quiet with components that shouldn't require excessive cooling). I had expected higher temperature numbers (this is cooler than the previous card, an ATI 4350). So either this is truly cool, or the airflow is working optimally (which I wouldn't expect, given the down-facing heat sink which probably isn't in an airflow path), or the temperature sensor is low. Yeah, I'd like to see a review with some hard numbers. Does this "green" 5570 consume fewer watts, and thus dissipate less heat, than the HIS 5570?

By the way, on the PowerColor "green" line...in the 5570, the heat sink fins run along the height of the card, but in the 5670 and 5750, they run along the length of the card, and the heat sink is heftier. So if airflow is from the front of the PC, it seems unlikely to flow through the fins of the 5570 and more likely on the higher models; instead it will bump into the end fin of the 5570. I don't know how much this matters. As I said, the heat numbers look good, so I can't say it's not working.

Post Reply