First impression: Zalman VF700-CU + 6800GT
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
Iceq pro 2 or vf700?
What is more silent (in idle mode)
The HIS iceq pro 2 solution on a x800pro
or the VF700 in 5v mode
I am thinking of buying a 800pro or XT HIS card, but only if it is a more silent solution than a 6800 GT with a 5v VF700.
any comment is appriciated
The HIS iceq pro 2 solution on a x800pro
or the VF700 in 5v mode
I am thinking of buying a 800pro or XT HIS card, but only if it is a more silent solution than a 6800 GT with a 5v VF700.
any comment is appriciated
Okay, tnx for your help
I have decided to get a VF-700-ALCU, and slap it on a 6800 GT (Point of View).
I will post temperatures from it once I get it and mount the VF700-ALCU.
Meanwhile, here is a test of the VF700-ALCU, from a german site . This was made on a FX5800 Ultra, a card as hot as the 6800 Ultra.
http://www.tweakers4u.de/p4cms/media/t4 ... aturen.gif
Link to test:
http://www.tweakers4u.de/artikel/zalman ... htm?page=1
I have decided to get a VF-700-ALCU, and slap it on a 6800 GT (Point of View).
I will post temperatures from it once I get it and mount the VF700-ALCU.
Meanwhile, here is a test of the VF700-ALCU, from a german site . This was made on a FX5800 Ultra, a card as hot as the 6800 Ultra.
http://www.tweakers4u.de/p4cms/media/t4 ... aturen.gif
Link to test:
http://www.tweakers4u.de/artikel/zalman ... htm?page=1
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 9:57 am
VF700 CU vs AL-CU
A dutch website tested the VF700 Cu and AL-CU, on a x800pro
The difference in temperature is 2 degrees, both in 5V and 12V.
Link: http://www.tweakers.net/reviews/546/2
They also show that VF700 is a better solution than Artic coolings NV 4.
Also, they get quite a different (better) result, than rojak did ,when he compared the VF700 AL-CU against Zalman old heatpipe solution...
Either Rojak messed up the mounting of the fan, or the VF700 is less effective with very hot card? (Rojaks test was on a 9800pro modded to a XT, a card hotter than the x800pro)
Link to Rojak: http://www.rojakpot.com/default.aspx?lo ... 165&var2=0
The difference in temperature is 2 degrees, both in 5V and 12V.
Link: http://www.tweakers.net/reviews/546/2
They also show that VF700 is a better solution than Artic coolings NV 4.
Also, they get quite a different (better) result, than rojak did ,when he compared the VF700 AL-CU against Zalman old heatpipe solution...
Either Rojak messed up the mounting of the fan, or the VF700 is less effective with very hot card? (Rojaks test was on a 9800pro modded to a XT, a card hotter than the x800pro)
Link to Rojak: http://www.rojakpot.com/default.aspx?lo ... 165&var2=0
The VF700-AlCu at 12V and the VF700-Cu at 5V were so close to each other in performance, you can consider them virtually similar in performance. It looks like a trade-off between a lighter and cheaper cooler versus a quieter but heavier and more expensive cooler. You make the choice!
I still miss accurate temp diode readings, but the result is nevertheless interesting. A big difference IMO.
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 10:16 pm
Also check out this comparison in german which compares with the excellent aerocool vm-101 and basically confirms that the Cu is the one to get.
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:20 am
- Location: MA
ok, either i'm doing something wrong, or my computer is just acting up really badly. i installed a vf-700cu on my 6800gt, and according to nvidia's temperature readings, i'm still around 55 degrees C. according to speefan, however, i'm somewhere around 40 to 44 degrees C. what other temperatures are people getting on their 6800gts?
the reason i'm asking is because whenever i try to play world of warcraft on 1680x1050, i get artifacts everywhere, to the point of non-playability.
to those who are wondering how much thermal paste, if any, did i use, i used the length of a short grain piece of rice, or sashimi rice, from artic silver 5. i put the single pipe cooler together on my 9600xt, and it ran fine, regardless of what i was running.
the reason i'm asking is because whenever i try to play world of warcraft on 1680x1050, i get artifacts everywhere, to the point of non-playability.
to those who are wondering how much thermal paste, if any, did i use, i used the length of a short grain piece of rice, or sashimi rice, from artic silver 5. i put the single pipe cooler together on my 9600xt, and it ran fine, regardless of what i was running.
* Did the artefacts appear after the fan swap?
* Are those load temps you are reporting?
* Have you overclocked the card?
* At what speed are you running the fan?
* Did you remove the HSF to see if the thermal compound was evenly spread?
Normal 6800GT temp with stock cooler is 60-75C (according to users on other forums) and 45-55 in idle.
I haven’t tried speedfan, but I believe NVIDIA's drivers will report the most accurate temperature (though I have no proof).
I would try to use a bit more thermal paste. I think early 9800Pro users reported high temps caused by too little paste combined with the slightly
elevated frame on the chip carrier. NVIDIA appear to be using the same frame. It's also hard to measure load temps, since it drops (in my case)
almost 8C the second I press ALT-TAB in HL2.
* Are those load temps you are reporting?
* Have you overclocked the card?
* At what speed are you running the fan?
* Did you remove the HSF to see if the thermal compound was evenly spread?
Normal 6800GT temp with stock cooler is 60-75C (according to users on other forums) and 45-55 in idle.
I haven’t tried speedfan, but I believe NVIDIA's drivers will report the most accurate temperature (though I have no proof).
I would try to use a bit more thermal paste. I think early 9800Pro users reported high temps caused by too little paste combined with the slightly
elevated frame on the chip carrier. NVIDIA appear to be using the same frame. It's also hard to measure load temps, since it drops (in my case)
almost 8C the second I press ALT-TAB in HL2.
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:20 am
- Location: MA
thanks for the reply. i suppose it couldn't hurt to apply more paste. i would think that CPUs would require more paste than a GPU, but apparently i might be wrong.
*there were no artifacts before the fan swap
*the temps i reported were at idle - at load it is 57C
*i haven't overclocked the card
*i'm now running the fan at 12v
*i currently cannot remove the HSF due to the fact that I have inadequate supplies in my dorm
*there were no artifacts before the fan swap
*the temps i reported were at idle - at load it is 57C
*i haven't overclocked the card
*i'm now running the fan at 12v
*i currently cannot remove the HSF due to the fact that I have inadequate supplies in my dorm
Sounds strange. I don't think it's a thermal related. Those temps are really good.smoothness wrote:thanks for the reply. i suppose it couldn't hurt to apply more paste. i would think that CPUs would require more paste than a GPU, but apparently i might be wrong.
*there were no artifacts before the fan swap
*the temps i reported were at idle - at load it is 57C
*i haven't overclocked the card
*i'm now running the fan at 12v
*i currently cannot remove the HSF due to the fact that I have inadequate supplies in my dorm
Just another thing: make sure not to apply thermal compound in the
area between then chip and the frame as I believe AS is conductive.
The decoupling caps doesn't appear to be isolated with lacquer.
EDIT: Forget what I said about the elevated frame, it's not.