First impression: Zalman VF700-CU + 6800GT

They make noise, too.

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

mlaw
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 6:19 pm

Iceq pro 2 or vf700?

Post by mlaw » Wed Jan 05, 2005 6:37 pm

What is more silent (in idle mode) :?:

The HIS iceq pro 2 solution on a x800pro

or the VF700 in 5v mode

I am thinking of buying a 800pro or XT HIS card, but only if it is a more silent solution than a 6800 GT with a 5v VF700.

any comment is appriciated :D

falcon26
Posts: 574
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 4:55 pm
Location: ca

Post by falcon26 » Wed Jan 05, 2005 7:45 pm

I would say the zalman vf700 My X800 Xt is actually the HIS X800XT anyway, and the artic cooler that was on their was making that dam clicking noise....so to me the zalman would be quieter and perform better but that's just my opinion......


falcon26

Creeky
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:43 am

Post by Creeky » Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:53 am

I have also just got this cooler to replace the arctic vga silencer and found in my setup it gives better temps and is far quieter :D. Only problem I have had is the ram sinks fell off as i didn't clean the ram chips properly but then the ram only gets slightly warm anyway

mlaw
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 6:19 pm

Post by mlaw » Thu Jan 06, 2005 2:47 pm

Okay, tnx for your help

I have decided to get a VF-700-ALCU, and slap it on a 6800 GT (Point of View).

I will post temperatures from it once I get it and mount the VF700-ALCU.

Meanwhile, here is a test of the VF700-ALCU, from a german site . This was made on a FX5800 Ultra, a card as hot as the 6800 Ultra.

http://www.tweakers4u.de/p4cms/media/t4 ... aturen.gif

Link to test:
http://www.tweakers4u.de/artikel/zalman ... htm?page=1

mlaw
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 6:19 pm

Post by mlaw » Thu Jan 06, 2005 2:50 pm

Whoops sorry

It is test of the VF700-CU not the VF700-ALCU

My goof

Creeky
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:43 am

Post by Creeky » Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:28 pm

as a side note my sig was out of date I have this cooler on a 6800 GT

Mike_Metro
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 9:57 am

Post by Mike_Metro » Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:19 pm

falcon26 or nbac (or anyone else) :D
Do you loose a PCI slot when using the VF700?

falcon26
Posts: 574
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 4:55 pm
Location: ca

Post by falcon26 » Thu Jan 06, 2005 5:31 pm

Yes the one next to the agp slot...........


falcon26

daba
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 3:30 am
Location: Berkeley, CA
Contact:

Post by daba » Thu Jan 06, 2005 5:36 pm

Anyone have any results comparing the AlCu vs. Cu only?

mlaw
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 6:19 pm

VF700 CU vs AL-CU

Post by mlaw » Mon Jan 10, 2005 5:39 am

A dutch website tested the VF700 Cu and AL-CU, on a x800pro

The difference in temperature is 2 degrees, both in 5V and 12V.

Link: http://www.tweakers.net/reviews/546/2

They also show that VF700 is a better solution than Artic coolings NV 4.

Also, they get quite a different (better) result, than rojak did ,when he compared the VF700 AL-CU against Zalman old heatpipe solution...
Either Rojak messed up the mounting of the fan, or the VF700 is less effective with very hot card? (Rojaks test was on a 9800pro modded to a XT, a card hotter than the x800pro)

Link to Rojak: http://www.rojakpot.com/default.aspx?lo ... 165&var2=0

daba
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 3:30 am
Location: Berkeley, CA
Contact:

Post by daba » Thu Jan 13, 2005 4:14 am

According to that German site, Zalman VF700 produces 37.5 dBa at 5V. I wonder how far they are measuring from?

v3n
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 3:48 am
Location: UK

Post by v3n » Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:50 am

Anyone got any ideas on why case temp goes down with one of these compared to an arctic cooler?

Im gonna fit this new zalman to a 6800 GT and was expecting case temp to rise :|

nbac
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Sweden

Post by nbac » Mon Jan 17, 2005 7:50 am

v3n wrote:Anyone got any ideas on why case temp goes down with one of these compared to an arctic cooler?

Im gonna fit this new zalman to a 6800 GT and was expecting case temp to rise :|
Probably, but I haven't seen it yet :shock:. No difference whatsoever. I also had the GF4200ti/ZM80 combo before.

tay
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 793
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2003 5:56 pm
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Post by tay » Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:26 pm


nbac
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Sweden

Post by nbac » Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:33 am

The VF700-AlCu at 12V and the VF700-Cu at 5V were so close to each other in performance, you can consider them virtually similar in performance. It looks like a trade-off between a lighter and cheaper cooler versus a quieter but heavier and more expensive cooler. You make the choice!

I still miss accurate temp diode readings, but the result is nevertheless interesting. A big difference IMO.

xxkrnxstylezxx
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 10:16 pm

Post by xxkrnxstylezxx » Fri Jan 28, 2005 2:19 pm

Is the ZM80DHP much better than the VF700-cu at 5v? I was going to get the VF700-cu, but i dunno....

I'm not even sure if the 80D HP will fit my card (BFG 6800oc - Non GT/Ultra)

tay
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 793
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2003 5:56 pm
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Post by tay » Fri Jan 28, 2005 7:48 pm

As an extremely satisfied owner of a zm80d, I say go with the vf700-cu. Easy to use/mount and more compatible. zm80D is phenomenal with a fan nearby but I Im gonna guess the vf700-cu will be better yet.

ilh
Posts: 313
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Acton, MA, USA -- Folding for SPCR

Post by ilh » Sun Feb 13, 2005 7:06 am

I'm planning to get an EVGA 6800 GT PCIe, which appears to be based on nVidia's reference PCB and HSF. Any idea if the stock memory heat sinks can be left as-is with the VF700?

--Lee

pinman
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 6:36 am

Post by pinman » Mon Feb 14, 2005 7:40 am

I wanted to do the same thing, but if the memory heat sink is the same as the AGP model you have to take it off.
This is a great product. On my vf700-cu I have the fan set to the lowest setting and after playing WoW for several hours the highest my temp gets is 60. And it is VERY quiet.

tay
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 793
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2003 5:56 pm
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Post by tay » Tue Feb 15, 2005 10:08 am

Also check out this comparison in german which compares with the excellent aerocool vm-101 and basically confirms that the Cu is the one to get.

smoothness
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:20 am
Location: MA

Post by smoothness » Wed Feb 16, 2005 8:54 am

ok, either i'm doing something wrong, or my computer is just acting up really badly. i installed a vf-700cu on my 6800gt, and according to nvidia's temperature readings, i'm still around 55 degrees C. according to speefan, however, i'm somewhere around 40 to 44 degrees C. what other temperatures are people getting on their 6800gts?

the reason i'm asking is because whenever i try to play world of warcraft on 1680x1050, i get artifacts everywhere, to the point of non-playability.

to those who are wondering how much thermal paste, if any, did i use, i used the length of a short grain piece of rice, or sashimi rice, from artic silver 5. i put the single pipe cooler together on my 9600xt, and it ran fine, regardless of what i was running.

nbac
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Sweden

Post by nbac » Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:18 am

* Did the artefacts appear after the fan swap?
* Are those load temps you are reporting?
* Have you overclocked the card?
* At what speed are you running the fan?
* Did you remove the HSF to see if the thermal compound was evenly spread?

Normal 6800GT temp with stock cooler is 60-75C (according to users on other forums) and 45-55 in idle.
I haven’t tried speedfan, but I believe NVIDIA's drivers will report the most accurate temperature (though I have no proof).

I would try to use a bit more thermal paste. I think early 9800Pro users reported high temps caused by too little paste combined with the slightly
elevated frame on the chip carrier. NVIDIA appear to be using the same frame. It's also hard to measure load temps, since it drops (in my case)
almost 8C the second I press ALT-TAB in HL2.

smoothness
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:20 am
Location: MA

Post by smoothness » Wed Feb 16, 2005 5:05 pm

thanks for the reply. i suppose it couldn't hurt to apply more paste. i would think that CPUs would require more paste than a GPU, but apparently i might be wrong.

*there were no artifacts before the fan swap
*the temps i reported were at idle - at load it is 57C
*i haven't overclocked the card
*i'm now running the fan at 12v
*i currently cannot remove the HSF due to the fact that I have inadequate supplies in my dorm

v3n
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 3:48 am
Location: UK

Post by v3n » Fri Feb 18, 2005 9:43 am

6800 GT with vf-700cu

my gpu @ idle is 55 with ambient @ 40

forceware 71.81

nbac
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Sweden

Post by nbac » Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:40 am

smoothness wrote:thanks for the reply. i suppose it couldn't hurt to apply more paste. i would think that CPUs would require more paste than a GPU, but apparently i might be wrong.

*there were no artifacts before the fan swap
*the temps i reported were at idle - at load it is 57C
*i haven't overclocked the card
*i'm now running the fan at 12v
*i currently cannot remove the HSF due to the fact that I have inadequate supplies in my dorm
Sounds strange. I don't think it's a thermal related. Those temps are really good.

Just another thing: make sure not to apply thermal compound in the
area between then chip and the frame as I believe AS is conductive.
The decoupling caps doesn't appear to be isolated with lacquer.

EDIT: Forget what I said about the elevated frame, it's not.

Post Reply