Quiet Cool-Running PCIE Graphics Card for a Server

They make noise, too.

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
gb115b
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:47 am
Location: London

Quiet Cool-Running PCIE Graphics Card for a Server

Post by gb115b » Fri Feb 06, 2009 7:17 am

any recommendations...

currently i have a 7600GS...is it work getting something really low level (as long as it has DVI) to reduce the heat output of my system?

QuietOC
Posts: 1407
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:08 pm
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Re: Quiet Cool-Running PCIE Graphics Card for a Server

Post by QuietOC » Fri Feb 06, 2009 7:30 am

gb115b wrote:any recommendations...

currently i have a 7600GS...is it work getting something really low level (as long as it has DVI) to reduce the heat output of my system?
The list is kept here.

If you look at the second graph arranged by idle power you see the Radeon HD 4650 at the bottom. Get a 4650 with the lowest power memory--the slowest DDR2 (no G) or maybe GDDR4. You may think it strange that a fairly fast gaming video card with a 55W TDP would be the best choice, but it probably is.

A cheap Radeon HD 4350 or 2400 XT is not too bad either, but cheap video cards might not implement idle power saving properly.

gb115b
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:47 am
Location: London

Post by gb115b » Fri Feb 06, 2009 7:56 am

thanks!

Mohan
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:09 pm
Location: Germany

Post by Mohan » Fri Feb 06, 2009 8:41 am

Would be interesting how low onboard graphics devices with DVI support would go...

gb115b
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:47 am
Location: London

Post by gb115b » Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:50 am

i guess look at the GMA500 scores on those charts....

QuietOC
Posts: 1407
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:08 pm
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Post by QuietOC » Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:57 am

Mohan wrote:Would be interesting how low onboard graphics devices with DVI support would go...
AMD's 740/780G IGPs idle <1W. Intel's IGPs are power hogs, and they actually consume more power when not being used (i.e., it takes more power to support a PCIe card). The G33/Q3x is the lowest power Intel desktop IGP at 5.75W idle / 14.5W TDP using IGP and 5.9W idle / 16W TDP using a separate video card.

Mohan
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:09 pm
Location: Germany

Post by Mohan » Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:08 am

QuietOC wrote:
Mohan wrote:Would be interesting how low onboard graphics devices with DVI support would go...
AMD's 740/780G IGPs idle <1W. Intel's IGPs are power hogs, and they actually consume more power when not being used (i.e., it takes more power to support a PCIe card). The G33/Q3x is the lowest power Intel desktop IGP at 5.75W idle / 14.5W TDP using IGP and 5.9W idle / 16W TDP using a separate video card.
Ah cool, thanks. Does this also include laptop devices? Given these figures the 4670 design would give a perfect laptop card...

QuietOC
Posts: 1407
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:08 pm
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Post by QuietOC » Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:14 am

Mohan wrote:Ah cool, thanks. Does this also include laptop devices? Given these figures the 4670 design would give a perfect laptop card...
Until someone runs Furmark on the laptop and the 4670 actually needs 70W of power! ;)

The 4670 is basically designed to take advantage of all the 75W specified for a standard PCIe x16 slot and no more. I am a little surprised that lower power forms of the 4670 aren't in more notebooks, but the Geforce 9800M/9600M variants are pretty decent.

Mohan
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:09 pm
Location: Germany

Post by Mohan » Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:30 am

Yeah that's true... 70W is... well, quite some :)

Post Reply