High Idle Power Consumption?

Got a shopping cart of parts that you want opinions on? Get advice from members on your planned or existing system (or upgrade).

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
AznJason
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:29 am

High Idle Power Consumption?

Post by AznJason » Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:52 pm

I was wondering (for any of the power consumption gurus out here) if my power consumption at idle seems on the high side.
  • Case: Antec Fusion V2 (with VFD on)
    Power Supply: Corsair HX520
    CPU: AMD BE-2400 (stock)
    MB: Abit AN-M2 HD
    RAM: 2GB Geil Esoteria (stock)
    HDD:
    • Hitachi 200GB 7K200 laptop drive
      Wester Digital 500GB AAKS
    VGA: Onboard disabled, HIS 3870 512 (not IceQ)
    Sound: SB X-Fi XtremeGamer
    TV Tuner: Hauppauge HVR-1600
    DVD: Samsung SH-203B
    Fans/Cooling:
    • Scythe Mini Ninja with 80mm Nexus
      2x120mm Nexus (exhaust)
      Zalman VF1000
At idle (with CnQ enabled), it draws ~131w measured using a Kill-a-Watt. I've seen people with similar setups minus the 3870, X-Fi, and TV Tuner pulling a lot less at idle. It seems like it could be right... but when I see things saying a 3870 pulls 20w at idle, I'm wondering what else is draining all the power (especially with the BE-2400 running at < 1GHz at idle). Should I start off by pulling out the 3870 and seeing how much idle power drops? (Does having it sit at the BIOS screen count as idle?)

mimwdv
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 3:54 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by mimwdv » Wed Jan 30, 2008 2:04 pm

Not sure whether it's too high or not, but it doesn't seem over the top to me. Some thoughts: Your tuner probably pulls ~10W - and the WD HD about the same. No idea about the X-Fi. How efficient is the Corsair at low wattage? I had a noticeable increase in efficiency when I swapped from a Seasonic s12 430W to a pico-psu, so you're probably losing a bit there too.

If you want to experiment, pulling out components one at a time is definitely the way to go. But I'd count my numbers at idle on the Windows desktop. That way CnQ is enabled, and everything is over its initial bootup power spike.

Scoop
Posts: 121
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 1:28 am

Post by Scoop » Wed Jan 30, 2008 2:38 pm

Tom's Hardware just did a recap on AMD power consumption and had the following results.

Image

The system had a HD3850 (little difference to 3870), AMD 790FX board, one 500GB WD HDD (you have an additional laptop drive which shouldn't affect much) and a 850W power supply which takes a hit in efficiency compared to yours, but not significantly. Additionally you have some fans, dvd-drive, tv-tuner, x-fi but I don't see them taking that much more while idle.

It does seem a bit high, maybe CnQ isn't working properly on your motherboard? People have reported that sometimes systems have drawn the same amount of power from the wall even when C1E and EIST were in effect and working according to CPU-Z.

AznJason
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:29 am

Post by AznJason » Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:15 pm

I saw the same article on TomsHardware and that got me thinking :)

I think I read somewhere that the 38x0 cards might lower their clock speeds at idle? Is that how the idle speed gets so low?
[edit] I found ATI PowerPlay, but I haven't seen how to turn it on or what not. I'm thinking this probably contributes to the higher idle. Anyone know? I only installed drivers and no catalyst control center.

Isn't a lower clock speed indicative of CnQ working properly?

AznJason
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:29 am

Post by AznJason » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:49 pm

I feel retarded. Somewhere within the Catalyst Control Center is PowerPlay, which is what makes the 38x0 idle low. Kinda silly that AMD has a processor driver that includes the power management stuff and "ATI" requires CCC on top of it's driver to do it.

My idle is down to 84 now. Much better than 131. :D

sebmex
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:29 am

Post by sebmex » Fri Dec 05, 2008 1:44 am

Hi,

finally I found someone that has used a vf1000 with an antec fusion/2400 case !!

I have a 8800 GT that I want to silence and I am wondering if this heatsink will fit in the case.

I have a pci slot taken also by my sound card (the one on the left side), a free pci slot and then the VGA PCI express slot for the 8800 GT, so very little room between the cards. (vent is on the left of the graphic card today, no heating problem, just noise).

I was wondering if this two slot heatsink would fit in the free pci slot space, and if vertically it fits and you still can close the case.

Very interested by your comments please !

Sebmex

Aris
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 10:29 am
Location: Bellevue, Nebraska
Contact:

Post by Aris » Sat Dec 06, 2008 2:16 am

motherboard/ram/cpu probably idles around 50watts

3870 around 20w

TV tuner is likely around 10w
Sound card another 10w
HDD's are around 10w

100w idle.

You specified 131w AC.

You have an 80+ 520w PSU, which means it will do 80% down to 20% load. 20% load of 520 is 104w.

80% * 131w ac = 105w

Seems right to me.

If this is an HTPC, you could get a better motherboard, and drop the 3870 all together along with the sound card and use onboard video and onboard sound. Would probably drop you down to around 70w idle, which would show up as around 90w AC on the killowatt.

If you use a digital SPDIF output for your sound, then the onboard codec wont matter much, but if you use the analog ports, look for one with a Realtek ALC889A codec. Its one of the best DAC's on the market for onboard sound.

As for onboard video, the new geforce 9300/9400 chipset does very well for HTPC purposes.

Id recommend this motherboard for your needs: Gigabyte GA-E7AUM-DS2H
You could get the board and a 2.5ghz 45nm wolfdale for $220, and use all your other existing parts.

Post Reply