Super-low-power desktop?

Got a shopping cart of parts that you want opinions on? Get advice from members on your planned or existing system (or upgrade).

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
NSParadox
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 2:25 pm
Location: San Mateo, CA
Contact:

Super-low-power desktop?

Post by NSParadox » Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:03 pm

Hi all,

I live in the San Francisco Bay Area, and I pay through the nose in electricity. We have a tiered energy payment, and some months I'm paying up to $0.40 per kwh for a portion of my energy. This means that for every idle watt, I pay $3.50 per year. For a 100W idle system, I'm paying $350 for electricity alone.

My current desktop is an Intel Q6600 w/ 4GB of RAM and an 8800GT. I haven't measured idle power, although I'm guessing it's close to 100W.

I'm considering replacing it with a low power machine for basic tasks (web + light gaming like Civizilation IV or some other games I've downloaded over Steam). I plan to still boot the Q6600 in the rare situation that I want to play a more graphically intensive game.

Any recommendations on a new system? I'm only interested in building a new box if I can pay for the machine with 1-2 years of energy savings. Would be great if I could get all of this + comparable performance to the Q6600 machine, but I'm guessing this isn't feasible.

Thanks for your help and suggestions!

frostedflakes
Posts: 1608
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: United States

Post by frostedflakes » Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:12 pm

Something similar to this would work well.

viewtopic.php?t=58228

ilovejedd
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 4:14 pm
Location: in the depths of hell

Post by ilovejedd » Fri Jul 09, 2010 4:29 am

Just a thought, why not have the PC automatically go on suspend when you're not using it? That's going to save you more money than building a new PC idling 24/7.

bonestonne
Posts: 1839
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:10 pm
Location: Northern New Jersey
Contact:

Post by bonestonne » Fri Jul 09, 2010 4:33 am

I agree with SFF, and with the AMD side of it.

I think even older/used parts could do the trick very well, such as an AMD 4xxxEE series and an ITX board. At the same time, even a mATX system could reach those numbers of low power, a PICO 90W or even a 60W.

At the same time, would a laptop system be able to compare? I know that laptops do have higher wattage bricks, however the battery portion could break it even right?

Just a thought.

ilovejedd
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 4:14 pm
Location: in the depths of hell

Post by ilovejedd » Fri Jul 09, 2010 5:03 am

bonestonne wrote:At the same time, would a laptop system be able to compare? I know that laptops do have higher wattage bricks, however the battery portion could break it even right?
I have one of those CULV laptops (UL30A-X5) and with the laptop battery removed, power consumption measured with a Kill-A-Watt is ~8W at lowest brightness. Pretty amazing considering that also includes the display.

lm
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 1251
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 6:14 am
Location: Finland

Re: Super-low-power desktop?

Post by lm » Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:22 am

NSParadox wrote:I haven't measured idle power, although I'm guessing it's close to 100W.
You really should start with actually measuring that, and while you are at it, other stuff too.

Only then you can make an educated decision about what is it that you really should replace, if anything.

alleycat
Posts: 740
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 10:32 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by alleycat » Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:05 am

I think I remember reading that the Apple Mac Mini idles at about 10W, and it's quiet too.

bonestonne
Posts: 1839
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:10 pm
Location: Northern New Jersey
Contact:

Post by bonestonne » Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:03 am

I have a VIA PC platform, the PC3500G, and it runs on a 40W power brick comfortably (but warm).

Using a SSD or some CF card with SATA adapter, you could probably get down a little more (compared to a 3.5" 7200RM drive).

It's all in what you're really looking to use, it's hard to say you're going to be able to get your energy bill to pay for this in 2 years or less, because computers still aren't exactly "cheap."

Gaming and low power just don't go together well enough to say it would pay for itself in 5 years even.

CA_Steve
Moderator
Posts: 7651
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Location: St. Louis, MO

Post by CA_Steve » Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:48 am

Your $350 in savings assumes you leave the PC on and not in a sleep state 24/7/365.

As an aside:
To get to the $0.40/kWH tier, you have to be @ 200% of the baseline for your area. For the bay side of San Mateo county (and not the ocean side), the summer baseline is 12.1kWH/day. So, 200% is 24.2kWH/day. That's a lot of juice :D

For the bigger picture - get a kill-a-watt meter and measure everything in your place. You probably have a lot of sources with better payback than your PC. I had an old refrigerator that was consuming 40% of the electricity in my place and kicking me into higher tiers. Replacing that paid for itself.

Back to your specifics: Your idle power is probably more than 100W due to the 8800GT. Probably closer to 120W. Replace it with a 5770 and your idle power will drop 40W. You can also try underclocking and undervolting the Q6600. Or, if you want to throw money at it, you can buy the 2nd PC for non gaming use. The Mac Mini has the lowest idle power out there and Steam supports Mac now.

victorhortalives
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 207
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:50 am
Location: Xhystos

Post by victorhortalives » Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:03 am

I built a system for just these requirements and kept the old one for "high power tasks" - file conversions etc.

The new system runs at under 40W when awake, (haven't checked it in a while so don't know exact figures - I'll update this when I have retested)

Zotac ION B overclocked to 2Ghz
2x 2GB 800Mhz Corsair memory sticks
1x 64GB Samsung SSD (all other drives on a GB LAN in a NAS)
1x 500rpm Scythe fan
DVD R/W drive

PSU : 60W Pico

victorhortalives
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 207
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:50 am
Location: Xhystos

Post by victorhortalives » Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:15 am

victorhortalives wrote:I built a system for just these requirements and kept the old one for "high power tasks" - file conversions etc.

The new system runs at under 40W when awake, (haven't checked it in a while so don't know exact figures - I'll update this when I have retested)

Zotac ION B overclocked to 2Ghz
2x 2GB 800Mhz Corsair memory sticks
1x 64GB Samsung SSD (all other drives on a GB LAN in a NAS)
1x 500rpm Scythe fan
DVD R/W drive

PSU : 60W Pico
UPDATE :

Just tested it again :

Off : 6.5W (power used by the Power Brick)
Booting : 38W max
Running : 31W/33W

scdr
Posts: 336
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:49 pm
Location: Upper left hand corner, USA

Post by scdr » Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:00 pm

See if you can borrow a Kill a watt or similar watt meter.

Many libraries, environmental groups or utilities have such for loan.

(e.g. see PG&E
http://www.pge.com/mybusiness/edusafety ... /index.jsp

Though that may be for businesses only.)


Use it to identify big energy users.
(e.g. lighting, cooling/refrigeration, etc.
http://www.pge.com/mybusiness/energysav ... ndex.shtml

Check the usual suspects (like cable boxes, televisions, DVRs, transformers and chargers for misc devices, etc.)

[Assume you have already done the no-brainer upgrades like CFLs.]

Instead of idling the system - turn it off (a simple power strip will
let you switch it to 0 power when not in use).

At that point you will have cut the electricity use by your computer a lot (assuming you don't actually use it 24/7).
You should also have an idea what your budget really is to consider upgrades. (In that short a time-frame, probably hard to find computer upgrades that would pay for themselves.)

Post Reply