What to get AMD 690G or Nvidia 7050?
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
Have you ever tried using CoreAVC as H264 decoder? I don't know if that also works for VC1, but you can always try. What I know of it is that it can decode H264 much more efficiently than other decoders like FFDSHOW. It even may be possible for you to decode 1080p content smoothly with that decoder installed!Roop wrote:780p playback is smooth as expected. i'm having some issues with 1080p (mkv files). that might be a software thing, i'm seeing cpu usage in the high 80's-90%
Of course, it's not free. But you can always look for it at "the black market of the internet".
I took out the PSU then put it into another PC and it worked so i put it back into the Fusion and it now works. First of the stock fan on the AMD is too loud even at its lowest speed. And the Tricool fans are louder then i thought, i was hoping to just run them at minimum but i guess i will have to replace them with Nexus 120mm. But apart from that i like this case, i have not jet heard the PSU and the disk silencing seams to work well. I have not jet tested the video playback of this system , just doing the normal stuff installed the os and anti virus , updated both... This is really not a HTPC it is just a family computer connected to a 17" monitor and a 50" plasma.
You mean your Asus M2N-VM DVI right?Roop wrote:mine is still having that crazy video crash intermittently, even with latest drivers and bios. it it wasn't for the fact that i'd have to re-install my os, i'd return this motherboard. i'm gonna wait till i can get a displayport compatible card and just slap it in there.
I read some review about the Asus M2N-VM HDMI that mentioned having trouble with using 1.9V memory because the bios defaults to 1.8V so the system won't start, so you have to use 1.8V memory to get into the BIOS to change the voltage, before you can swap in the 1.9V memory... and if you clear the CMOS or update the BIOS (possibly) you're back where you started... so beware.
Just some followup on this:
The onboard video card is absolute crap. It is only powerful enough to playback 720p videos that are at low bitrates. it has a bad horizontal line issue/tearing with higher bitrate files. you have to play most videos in overlay mode in windows media player which means no external subtitles.
standard divx playback looks like a streaming youtube video because it doesn't seem to have any deblocking abilities. i'm really sorry now that i didn't get the amd version.
i upgraded the video by installing a pcie ati x1900 card. divx is much cleaner and 720p files don't have tearing. i can play them in vrm9 mode which allows for external subs.
1080p files are another story. very high bitrate (45 minutes in 5gb) clogs the dual core 2ghz cpu on high motion scenes. this behaviour has only been seen with the planet earth series. other 1080p movies play well.
this is the worst nvidia chipset i have ever used and will not recommend it. it totally defeats the purpose if i have to buy a standalone card to play divx files properly.
regarding coreavc - this was awesome until ffdshow's latest release which is multithreaded. now it's as good as that stupid nvidia chip.
The onboard video card is absolute crap. It is only powerful enough to playback 720p videos that are at low bitrates. it has a bad horizontal line issue/tearing with higher bitrate files. you have to play most videos in overlay mode in windows media player which means no external subtitles.
standard divx playback looks like a streaming youtube video because it doesn't seem to have any deblocking abilities. i'm really sorry now that i didn't get the amd version.
i upgraded the video by installing a pcie ati x1900 card. divx is much cleaner and 720p files don't have tearing. i can play them in vrm9 mode which allows for external subs.
1080p files are another story. very high bitrate (45 minutes in 5gb) clogs the dual core 2ghz cpu on high motion scenes. this behaviour has only been seen with the planet earth series. other 1080p movies play well.
this is the worst nvidia chipset i have ever used and will not recommend it. it totally defeats the purpose if i have to buy a standalone card to play divx files properly.
regarding coreavc - this was awesome until ffdshow's latest release which is multithreaded. now it's as good as that stupid nvidia chip.
-
- Friend of SPCR
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 4:50 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
What to get AMD 780G or Nvidia 8200?
I suspect the main question posed by this thread has become irrelevant with the recent arrival of AMD 780G and imminent arrival of nVidia 8200.
Re: What to get AMD 780G or Nvidia 8200?
Can you explain this please?Firetech wrote:I suspect the main question posed by this thread has become irrelevant with the recent arrival of AMD 780G and imminent arrival of nVidia 8200.
Since I'm still looking around for the best 690G board to buy, maybe I should be looking at the newer generation of chipsets, althought they are more expensive. Are they worth the extra cost?
-
- Friend of SPCR
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 4:50 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
Re: What to get AMD 780G or Nvidia 8200?
The cost difference is negligible here in Oz and the performance difference vast by all reports.juamez wrote:Since I'm still looking around for the best 690G board to buy, maybe I should be looking at the newer generation of chipsets, althought they are more expensive. Are they worth the extra cost?
It's certainly the chipset I'm going for.
http://www.silentpcreview.com/article807-page1.html
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/sh ... spx?i=3258
Add to that:
http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/03/04/ ... g_chipset/
Right now, the only 780g board available in stores (in NL) is the Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H but I hope that will soon change. According to Tom's, it consumes a few Watt less than the Gigabyte GA-MA69GM-S2H, but that one was high in power consumption according to one person on this board, as compared to a BioStar TA690G-AM2 (~10W difference).
It will soon be time for a new thread .
http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/03/04/ ... g_chipset/
Right now, the only 780g board available in stores (in NL) is the Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H but I hope that will soon change. According to Tom's, it consumes a few Watt less than the Gigabyte GA-MA69GM-S2H, but that one was high in power consumption according to one person on this board, as compared to a BioStar TA690G-AM2 (~10W difference).
It will soon be time for a new thread .