P5K-E Speedstep + Overclocking

All about them.

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
jimmyzaas
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto, CANADA

P5K-E Speedstep + Overclocking

Post by jimmyzaas » Sat Apr 12, 2008 1:58 pm

Is there anyone out there that is using Speedstep on a P5K-E while overclocking a CPU? More importantly, does it work properly?

On idle, not only should the multiplier drop, the vcore should also drop. I have verified this to work on my Gigabyte P35-DS4 but the board is some 40 bucks more expensive than the P5K-E which has everything the DS4 had. There lies my dilemma.

EDIT: P35-DS4 + Q6600 @ 3.00 GHz stock volts - SPEEDSTEP works properly

Almost everywhere I go, everyone says the same thing. "Turn off Speedstep!" With electricity bills becoming more expensive, I wish to keep power consumption to a minimum. I also want to keep temperatures to a minimum since that room can reach 35+ degrees celsius in the summer.

I plan to use it with a E8400 cpu. Any ideas whether Speedstep will work properly on this board?

Redzo
Posts: 464
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:51 am
Location: Sweden, Stockholm

Re: P5K-E Speedstep + Overclocking

Post by Redzo » Sat Apr 12, 2008 4:03 pm

jimmyzaas wrote:Is there anyone out there that is using Speedstep on a P5K-E while overclocking a CPU? More importantly, does it work properly?

On idle, not only should the multiplier drop, the vcore should also drop. I have verified this to work on my Gigabyte P35-DS4 but the board is some 40 bucks more expensive than the P5K-E which has everything the DS4 had. There lies my dilemma.

EDIT: P35-DS4 + Q6600 @ 3.00 GHz stock volts - SPEEDSTEP works properly

Almost everywhere I go, everyone says the same thing. "Turn off Speedstep!" With electricity bills becoming more expensive, I wish to keep power consumption to a minimum. I also want to keep temperatures to a minimum since that room can reach 35+ degrees celsius in the summer.

I plan to use it with a E8400 cpu. Any ideas whether Speedstep will work properly on this board?
Let me chime in here. Turn off speedstep if you are overclocking. Speedstep kills performance too especially memory performance since it relies on CPU for that. Run some tests with it enabled and disabled and compare those 2...
There is a reason why everybody (mostly) is turning it off.

jimmyzaas
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto, CANADA

Post by jimmyzaas » Sat Apr 12, 2008 5:45 pm

Wait a minute.

Unless I have something seriously wrong with my memory, the memory performance has nothing to do with the intel CPU. Only AMDs have memory controllers integrated into them at the moment. The only thing that could affect memory performance would be the bus speed.

How would Speedstep be any different on an overclocked machine versus a stock machine? By overclocked, I mean a minor one that stock volts can hold (Sorry.. I forgot to mention this). And not something that would require me to push the CPU to 1.6 vcore or some ridiculous value. Most of the users that require C1E/Speedstep disabled are indeed doing much higher overclocks at non stock voltage.

So far I have read one post of a user on SPCR doing exactly what I did on a DS4. Stock volts overclock + proper speedstep. There must be someone that is doing the same with a P5K-E... I hope.

ReelMonza
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 8:20 am

Post by ReelMonza » Sat Apr 12, 2008 9:54 pm

AFAIK if you push the FSB too high, the board will automatically overvolt the CPU Voltage... even if the CPU Voltage is set to "Auto"... damn you ASUS !

I had a E4400 CPU (FSB800) and Speedstep was fine up to 280MHz (1120MHz) or 40%, anything beyond that CPU voltage wont drop, the board will take over the CPU voltage and overvolt it.

Here's something interesting at X-bit labs:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/mainbo ... html#sect0

jimmyzaas
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto, CANADA

Post by jimmyzaas » Sun Apr 13, 2008 7:31 am

Thanks for the reply.. I guess Gigabyte is my only way out of this with its "Normal" setting.. The Asus seems like such a deal tho.. damn it! Has everything + wifi!

ReelMonza
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 8:20 am

Post by ReelMonza » Sun Apr 13, 2008 3:57 pm

Yeah GB doesnt have such limitation.
It will however disable Speedstep if you manually choose a CPU Voltage, just like all other boards.
I noticed that the ASUS board tends to override the "Auto" option when the FSB is 40% beyond stock, at least that's what happened with the FSB800 CPU.

The Q6600 is a FSB1066 CPU so Speedstep should work up to 1489.6MHz FSB if my theory is right.
Well, but my theory could be wrong and the board might actually be programmed to overvolt the CPU when the FSB is over 1120MHz.
You'll have to test. I couldnt get ahold of any FSB1066 CPUs back then.

GB P35 boards in my opinion have better overall features, BIOS, overclocking capabilities, build quality, sound codecs.
They lack extensive fan control though.

crabnebula
Posts: 42
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:04 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by crabnebula » Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:44 pm

Indeed, the P5K-E will set a fixed Vcore when you raise FSB (not sure about 40% threshold). However, you can use SetFSB to increase the FSB after Windows has loaded and EIST will then function normally. With a Q6600, you can also do the pin mod trick to change FSB to 333 permanently.

ReelMonza
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 8:20 am

Post by ReelMonza » Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:13 pm

The 40% threshold might not apply to all boards I guess.
The P5B-PLUS I had certainly had that threshold with E4500 CPU.

I also heard that ASUS P5E-VM HDMI will set a fixed CPU voltage as soon as you overclock, please check this thread over RightMark Forums.

As for the pin mod, it didnt work with the P5B Plus as the board wouldnt recognize the forced FSB1333MHz strap and would always boot using the defautl FSB800 strap.

Yes using SetFSB would be good but I also had S3 standby issues with high FSB, so that didnt help much.

crabnebula
Posts: 42
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:04 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by crabnebula » Thu Apr 24, 2008 1:33 pm

There might be a 40% threshold, I wouldn't know since I always went straight to FSB 333.

When using SetFSB, the only issue I have is that when resuming from S3 standby, the FSB falls back to its default of 266. So I just execute SetFSB again when needed. Alternatively, you can run a script automatically when resuming from standby.

ReelMonza
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 8:20 am

Post by ReelMonza » Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:17 pm

The problem is while the FSB was overclocked via SetFSB, the board wouldnt resume after going into standby, even if it resumed I'd have to increase the FSB in just a few steps, going from FSB800 to FSB1333 via script could sometimes crash the system.

Post Reply