Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3H vs. GA-MA78GM-S2H vs. Asus M3A-H/HDMI
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3H vs. GA-MA78GM-S2H vs. Asus M3A-H/HDMI
I'm considering one of the above mentioned motherboards.
I lean towards GA-MA78G-DS3H due to ATX, firewire and a proven fan control - I believe it's the same, as on the GA-MA78GM-S2H, as tested by SPCR.
Though, I dont like the 8 watt when off-power, measured by SPCR. Du you guys get the same readings? There've been 2-3 BIOS updates, since the SPCR review, so things might have changed.
Do some of you have experience with the Asus? The NB/SB coolers seems to be better... And how about the fan-controller and stability?
As far as I can judge by the SPCR threads on GA-MA78-DS2H, it's quite stable, and the bugs should be sorted out?
I found this link, to Gigabyte GA-MA78-DS2H reviews, if someone's interested.
Thanks.
I lean towards GA-MA78G-DS3H due to ATX, firewire and a proven fan control - I believe it's the same, as on the GA-MA78GM-S2H, as tested by SPCR.
Though, I dont like the 8 watt when off-power, measured by SPCR. Du you guys get the same readings? There've been 2-3 BIOS updates, since the SPCR review, so things might have changed.
Do some of you have experience with the Asus? The NB/SB coolers seems to be better... And how about the fan-controller and stability?
As far as I can judge by the SPCR threads on GA-MA78-DS2H, it's quite stable, and the bugs should be sorted out?
I found this link, to Gigabyte GA-MA78-DS2H reviews, if someone's interested.
Thanks.
-
- Patron of SPCR
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 8:37 pm
- Location: Mississauga, ON
- Contact:
I am still not sure what to make of the Gigabyte MA78GM-S2H (matx). So far it has run decent, but mine has a bios bug/corruption where I can't update the bios (probably because I tried using Gigabyte's @bios to update; DO NOT USE IT!!). The NB spouts an enormous amount of thermals which raises ambient temperatures; something you don't want to do when there could be a video card right next to it (4850 for me, can't even overclock it because of the excess heat). The board also does not offer undervolting/clocking.
The board only allows undervolting of the CPU in the BIOS. DDR and others are only above spec.nutball wrote:Huh? Sounds like you've got a duff board then. Mine undervolts/underclocks rather nicely from the BIOS.lowteckh wrote:The board also does not offer undervolting/clocking.
Also, if you're using an discrete GPU the onboard GPU should be disabled and not generating much heat at all.
my notes on this board:
-nice small fully featured
-you can have others like it from ASRock and ECS
-the cooler gets pretty hot
-fan control is ONLY automatic, you can't limit it say like 50% max or something, but it can be by voltage or PWM
-the BIOS can be updated if you unzip/unrar that EXE file and put the big 1Mb file on a USB stick -> reboot -> enter BIOS -> enter QFLASH -> select file from the USB stick
-the Linux k8temp sensor outputs wrong temperatures, needs a 20 or 30 degrees offset
-nice small fully featured
-you can have others like it from ASRock and ECS
-the cooler gets pretty hot
-fan control is ONLY automatic, you can't limit it say like 50% max or something, but it can be by voltage or PWM
-the BIOS can be updated if you unzip/unrar that EXE file and put the big 1Mb file on a USB stick -> reboot -> enter BIOS -> enter QFLASH -> select file from the USB stick
-the Linux k8temp sensor outputs wrong temperatures, needs a 20 or 30 degrees offset
i guess i'll be using fglrx ( the closed one ) until the F/OSS one gets the 3D part up and running ( keep an eye on Phoronix.com )ido wrote:Licaon, I see you are using Linux with this board, which driver do you use for the IGP? Do you recommend this board for a Linux based system?
for now, i have my Gainward nVidia 8600GT + ASUS Xonar DX inside this system until my MSI K9A2 CF-F motherboard returns from the service, hopefully that would be next week
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?optio ... 5&Itemid=1
At this time I believe I would wait for the 790GX chipset. However, I do understand that perhaps if you do not intend to game there is no purpose in waiting. Other than to have the most up to date chipset, of course.
At this time I believe I would wait for the 790GX chipset. However, I do understand that perhaps if you do not intend to game there is no purpose in waiting. Other than to have the most up to date chipset, of course.