CF card as cheap harddisk isn't dream
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
CF card as cheap harddisk isn't dream
Hi, friends,as CF card capacity is bigger and bigger,now 16GB CF is normal,but the price of CF card becomes more cheaper day after day.Why don't we put one CF to IDE adapter in the computer,then we can install operation systerm in CF card as harddisk,it is very fast ,small power,little voice.I suggest you can use the following CF to IDE adapter.
image from http://www.pcadapter.cn
image from http://www.pcadapter.cn
cf to ide adapter: back panel
This adapter can put in PC case,then insert CF card from back outside of PC case .
There is absolutely no need for special software on the OS side of the system for spreading the writes. Wear leveling is performed on the CF card itself as the OS and drivers do not have direct access to the flash memory blocks. This wear leveling is already done on all decent quality flash drives that are meant to be used in computer systems.Eunos wrote:If someone makes software to spread the write cycles over the whole drive it could work for a main OS drive. Otherwise it would be wiser to wait for proper flash hard drives to become more affordable, which is happening currently.
-
- Posts: 2049
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:06 am
- Location: Klamath Falls, OR
On my second attempt, I got a Transcend 2G CF card (latest version) to work with a new Syba card. The Syba card I purchased almost a year earlier didn't work for some reason.
Once Windows had booted, it worked OK. It came already FDISKed and FORMATted - do not attempt to do this from DOS as you might with a standard hard disk. It's all one partition and "FAT" - FAT16 or FAT32 or whatever unspecified - or is "FAT" the floppy standard? No matter, it works.
Now the bad news. Your disks are evaluated in DOS before posting and the actual Windows boot begins. DOS does not trust the CF card as an IDE device and requires an additional ~3 minutes every time you boot.
I now use Corsair Voyager USB drives (flash) in backups, which was my intended use of the CF card. The boot problem is so annoying, the fact that writes were slow, and small-file writes were very slow, is beside the point.
Once Windows had booted, it worked OK. It came already FDISKed and FORMATted - do not attempt to do this from DOS as you might with a standard hard disk. It's all one partition and "FAT" - FAT16 or FAT32 or whatever unspecified - or is "FAT" the floppy standard? No matter, it works.
Now the bad news. Your disks are evaluated in DOS before posting and the actual Windows boot begins. DOS does not trust the CF card as an IDE device and requires an additional ~3 minutes every time you boot.
I now use Corsair Voyager USB drives (flash) in backups, which was my intended use of the CF card. The boot problem is so annoying, the fact that writes were slow, and small-file writes were very slow, is beside the point.
I thought when someones first post started out hi friends, it looked like a sales pitch, and that is why I asked what was special about this particular adapter that was being pushed.
Frankly, the rear mount is of no interest to me. My typical systems have one IDE cable for optical drive(s) and one for hard drives. If I was building a system, and was sure I would never need a hard drive, then maybe this one would be OK, but I would rather have either an internal one mounted where the hard rives go, or better yet, cut a slot in a drive slot cover and set it up so it could load from the front. Rear mounted, it would be too far away from the hard drive slots if I ever wanted a combination of hard drive plus CF.
Of course, I was ignoring the claim of "very fast", as Felger has hit on.
Frankly, the rear mount is of no interest to me. My typical systems have one IDE cable for optical drive(s) and one for hard drives. If I was building a system, and was sure I would never need a hard drive, then maybe this one would be OK, but I would rather have either an internal one mounted where the hard rives go, or better yet, cut a slot in a drive slot cover and set it up so it could load from the front. Rear mounted, it would be too far away from the hard drive slots if I ever wanted a combination of hard drive plus CF.
Of course, I was ignoring the claim of "very fast", as Felger has hit on.
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:14 pm
- Location: Vancouver
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 5:09 pm
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 5:09 pm
CF card is not slow
Copper wrote:Compact Flash isn't the best SSD solution. It's painfully slow. Affordable, but slow.
Perhaps you bought the CF card speed is very slow.If you use high speed CF card,it can start OS very quickly .
-
- Posts: 2049
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:06 am
- Location: Klamath Falls, OR
-
- Posts: 2049
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:06 am
- Location: Klamath Falls, OR
CF card as cheap harddisk isn't dream now
I think it will be same speed in windows, but windows is too big,not suitable be installed in the CF card unless you can find CF card 40GB or more.autoboy wrote:I used CF in an embeded DOS comptuer on a vibration testbed. The entire computer was passive and vibration free. It worked well with DOS and Linux but I'm not sure how well it would have handled Windows