What is the quietest ~1TB drive?

Silencing hard drives, optical drives and other storage devices

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
glas
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 2:50 pm

What is the quietest ~1TB drive?

Post by glas » Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:32 pm

I'm looking to get some 1TB (+/-) drives. Which ones are the quietest (idle) these days? WD Green?

tehfire
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:57 am
Location: US

Post by tehfire » Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:51 pm

Yes

FartingBob
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 744
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:05 am
Location: London
Contact:

Post by FartingBob » Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:13 am

tehfire wrote:Yes
What he said.

glas
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 2:50 pm

Post by glas » Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:28 am

WD10EACS?

tehfire
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:57 am
Location: US

Post by tehfire » Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:55 am

EACS or EADS should be of the same acoustic properties, the only difference being the EADS has 32MB of cache as opposed to the EACS and its 16MB of cache. Originally, the EADS had fewer platters (and thus a greater potential for being quiet) than the EACS, but they incorporated this into the EACS line a while back, so both should be equally quiet.

glas
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 2:50 pm

Post by glas » Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:19 am

Looks like the wd10eads is almost cheaper (shipping, tax included). I was not sure if cache has a positive or negative impact on a raid setup.
Alos, it looks like 2 x 1.5TB is still more expensive than 3 x 1TB?

Jay_S
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 715
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Post by Jay_S » Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:46 am

I believe the EADS 1TB is guaranteed to have 3 333GB platters, where getting the 333GB platters with the EACS is more of a gamble. I might be wrong on this. Comparing the 333GB platter drives to the 250GB platter drives, the 333GB ones are a little quicker and use a little less power.

Trav1s
Posts: 259
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 12:33 pm
Location: CR, IA

Post by Trav1s » Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:06 am

I have the WD10EADS (1TB 32MB) at home to install over the weekend. I will let you know what I think compared to the WD6400AAKS (640GB 7200 RPM 16MB) I have in the same machine.

Mohan
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:09 pm
Location: Germany

Post by Mohan » Sat Mar 14, 2009 4:08 pm

What about Hitachi drives? Significantly more noise? Samsung and Seagate for sure...

QuietOC
Posts: 1407
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:08 pm
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Post by QuietOC » Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:25 pm

Mohan wrote:What about Hitachi drives? Significantly more noise? Samsung and Seagate for sure...
Probably quietest: WD Green, Samsung EcoGreen, Hitachi 7K1000.B, Samsung F2/F1. The 2-platter 1TB Seagate might be good.

merlin
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 6:48 am
Location: San Francisco, CA

Post by merlin » Sun Mar 15, 2009 1:04 am

QuietOC wrote:
Mohan wrote:What about Hitachi drives? Significantly more noise? Samsung and Seagate for sure...
Probably quietest: WD Green, Samsung EcoGreen, Hitachi 7K1000.B, Samsung F2/F1. The 2-platter 1TB Seagate might be good.
The 3-platter 1TB seagate is pretty good also actually. I can barely tell they're seeking over their idle now.

Fred
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Northern Sweden

Post by Fred » Sun Mar 15, 2009 2:58 pm

I found this samsung drive called F2 HD103SI.
It's supposed to be a 1TB 5400rpm drive on two platters. Sounds really good as a storage unit.

On that note, how big difference is it between 7200rpm and 5400rpm drives?
Could I, say, watch some ultra high-tech format movie from a 5400rpm drive without any slowdowns in framerate?

Vicotnik
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 1831
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:53 am
Location: Sweden

Post by Vicotnik » Sun Mar 15, 2009 3:55 pm

Fred wrote:On that note, how big difference is it between 7200rpm and 5400rpm drives?
Could I, say, watch some ultra high-tech format movie from a 5400rpm drive without any slowdowns in framerate?
Yeah, no problem. As a storage drive it's not much difference between 5400RPM and 7200RPM. As a system drive the difference is more significant since a 5400RPM drive has slower seek times, not good when you want to access many smaller files quickly.

Fred
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Northern Sweden

Post by Fred » Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:45 am

Ok, cool. I will probably be getting one then.

Post Reply