Samsung F3 1TB SMART "Write Error Rate" increasing

Silencing hard drives, optical drives and other storage devices

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
line
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 10:07 pm
Location: Israel

Samsung F3 1TB SMART "Write Error Rate" increasing

Post by line » Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:27 am

I own a Samsung F3 1TB drive and have recently installed the same model for a friend.

I have been worried about my drive for a long time now because the Write Error Rate value has been steadily increasing and it grows by 1 every 100GB of writes or so.

Image

Now the same thing happens on the friend's drive. It is already 1 and I suspect it is going to increase. The drives are otherwise healthy. Anyone else seeing this?

wiizer99
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 6:39 am
Location: USA

Post by wiizer99 » Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:41 am

FWIW,
I have 2 F3 1TB drives in my ubuntu mdadm raid1
both drives have about 300-400 hrs, and one has 2 multi zone error rate of 2
the other one, 1
smart seems to indicate that the drives are healthy
-bests

Cryoburner
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:25 am

Post by Cryoburner » Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:38 pm

If that's a screenshot of your results, I get the impression that HD Tune might just be reading your SMART data wrong. The free version was last updated two and half years ago, before that drive existed, after all. The screenshot you posted shows the write error data value at 51, with the threshold at 0. On my drives in this system (a Samsung and a WD), the two values are opposite that, with the data at 0 and the threshold at 51. Are you sure it's increasing, or did you just happen to see it at 51 and assumed it's been? That's probably the threshold value, not the data value.

HD Tune also lists your drive's temperature at 917546, which also seems a little wrong compared to the temperatures of around 40 that are listed for my drives. : )

line
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 10:07 pm
Location: Israel

Post by line » Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:44 am

Thanks for the input.

@Cryoburner

I agree the free version is aging, but it reads the data correctly here. "51" is the real data, and only by coincidence it is also a common number for threshold. I've been following it from the very start and it just keeps increasing. For example, when I wrote this post it was 9. I hope someone can clarify what this value indicates.

Here is what HDDScan reads (33 Hex = 51)

Image

Redzo
Posts: 464
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:51 am
Location: Sweden, Stockholm

Post by Redzo » Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:15 am

use crystal disk info. much newer and better program that will alow you to control AAM/APM on many brands too. And its free and open source.

line
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 10:07 pm
Location: Israel

Post by line » Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:12 pm

Thanks for the tip

Arbutus
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:15 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Post by Arbutus » Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:45 pm

Different manufacturers use different names and meanings of attributes and the interpretation of their raw values is not specified by any standard.

I would worry if the Reallocated Sector Count increases quickly.

Post Reply