Ninja Copper Version
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
-
- Posts: 3142
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:20 am
- Location: Missing in Finnish wilderness, howling to moon with wolf brethren and walking with brother bears
- Contact:
Ninja Copper Version
Its just brief foto, but its here. Full Copper Version of Ninja. *Blinks still hard*
I wonder how much that thing weights? Unfortunately it seems to have regular ninja's heatpipe arrangement. Full copper version probably weights a lot. probably around 900 grams. I do hope then Scythe puts bolt thru board attachment system.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 5:32 pm
According to:
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Computex2007/Scythe/
It won't be released.
"The Ninja is one few passive heatsinks out there and Scythe also has the all copper variant at the booth. This one will not be sold, as the material is simply to expensive to justify the slight increase in performance."
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Computex2007/Scythe/
It won't be released.
"The Ninja is one few passive heatsinks out there and Scythe also has the all copper variant at the booth. This one will not be sold, as the material is simply to expensive to justify the slight increase in performance."
I think that pic is from the begining of 2006 and never made it to market. I bought the Ninja like a month before I saw it and thought "O' crap I shouldve waited!".
edit: maybe not the pic I thought, I didnt notice the Ninja Mini the first time I looked at it. I first heard of this thing a few months back and have been impatiently awaiting its release.
edit: maybe not the pic I thought, I didnt notice the Ninja Mini the first time I looked at it. I first heard of this thing a few months back and have been impatiently awaiting its release.
its from like 3 days ago
http://www.pcmasters.de/hardware/review ... 007/1.html
check out the monster
http://www.pcmasters.de/hardware/review ... 007/1.html
check out the monster
You probably think that because Scythe show a copper Ninja every year. It was mentioned here in 2005, and again in 2006.practal wrote:I think that pic is from the begining of 2006...
The main reason the copper version is not available, as I recall, is that there was no real performance increase for the increased cost.
For a recent example, check out FrostyTech's recent side-by-side Falcon92 reviews- the aluminum model is neck and neck with the copper, and probably costs significantly less to build.
For a recent example, check out FrostyTech's recent side-by-side Falcon92 reviews- the aluminum model is neck and neck with the copper, and probably costs significantly less to build.
-
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 9:54 pm
- Location: USA
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 8:15 pm
- Location: Michigan
-
- Posts: 2049
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:06 am
- Location: Klamath Falls, OR
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 8:15 pm
- Location: Michigan