panaflo L1A vs. M1A
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
panaflo L1A vs. M1A
i have a thermalright slk-800a with a panaflo L1A that can cool 100 watts of heat from a 1700+ palomino at 1.83ghz to 63c. i'm looking to overclock my new 1800+ thoroughbred to 2.5ghz (crossing fingers...) but it should theoretically put out upwards of 125 watts of heat! if i switch to a panaflo M1A instead of an L1A, will this be enough to compensate for the additional 25 watts of heat for the same temperatures?
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 12:23 pm
- Location: Northern California by way of Finland
I'm not sure whether this helps, but do you know how the Panaflo M1A and L1A compare to NMB 3610KL-04W-B40? It is rated at 47.67CFM at 12V, and I have a one running at 5V cooling a Tbred-B 1700+ (i.e. 1.45GHz) running at 2.4GHz. I would imagine that at 5V the NMB fan has less airflow than either of the Panaflos at 12V, but I could be thoroughly wrong.
As for the overclock, so far I've had two of the 1700+ varieties running at 2.5GHz, but only with the CPU fan at 12V. 2.4GHz is fine with 5V though
As for the overclock, so far I've had two of the 1700+ varieties running at 2.5GHz, but only with the CPU fan at 12V. 2.4GHz is fine with 5V though
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 12:23 pm
- Location: Northern California by way of Finland
Ooops, I just noticed that I missed a few crucial details in the original post. That's what you get when posting all sleepy-like
I'm using an SLK-900U instead of SLK-800, and that NMB fan is a 92mm one instead of 80mm one. I have run the CPU @ 2.4GHz with an 80mm Yate Loon fan rated at around 19CMF (I think; it was one that came with our Chieftec cases) at 12V, with the SLK-900. I'm not sure how that scales to SLK-800, but I think it's promising.
I'm using an SLK-900U instead of SLK-800, and that NMB fan is a 92mm one instead of 80mm one. I have run the CPU @ 2.4GHz with an 80mm Yate Loon fan rated at around 19CMF (I think; it was one that came with our Chieftec cases) at 12V, with the SLK-900. I'm not sure how that scales to SLK-800, but I think it's promising.
well, i upped my voltage to 1.85 last night and it's stable in windows at 2.5ghz (166*15) but crashes in 3dmark03. i'm hoping that it just needs to be a little cooler, or else i'll have to look into a voltage mod. it is good news, though, that it at least runs at 2.5ghz....wsc wrote:Personally, I would be pretty suprised if you were able to accomplish it. That is a massive overclock...
the L1A is rated at 1900rpm and 24cfm while the M1A is rated at 2500rpm and 32cfm. i currently have my L1A hooked up to the fan only connector on my antec 380s psu so the voltage ramps up to 12v when the cpu is under load. i assume the M1A would do the same, so i'd get the full 32cfm when i needed it.Vaeltaja wrote:I'm not sure whether this helps, but do you know how the Panaflo M1A and L1A compare to NMB 3610KL-04W-B40? It is rated at 47.67CFM at 12V, and I have a one running at 5V cooling a Tbred-B 1700+ (i.e. 1.45GHz) running at 2.4GHz. I would imagine that at 5V the NMB fan has less airflow than either of the Panaflos at 12V, but I could be thoroughly wrong.
basically what i'm wondering is if 24cfm is sufficient for 100 watts of heat with my slk-800a, is 32cfm sufficient for 125 watts of heat? how would i go about figuring it out?
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 12:23 pm
- Location: Northern California by way of Finland
By trying it?basically what i'm wondering is if 24cfm is sufficient for 100 watts of heat with my slk-800a, is 32cfm sufficient for 125 watts of heat? how would i go about figuring it out?
BTW, I seriously doubt your 1800+ @ 2.5GHz would generate 125W heat. Am I correct in assuming that you got that number from Radiate? I think Radiate's figures are a bit.. generous.
As I said, I've ran the 1700+ @ 2.4GHz with a 19CFM 80mm fan with an SLK-900. I would imagine that the SLK-800 would fare roughly the same, and maybe even better when coupled with a better fan.
well, sounds like good advice to me! i'm going to play with the various fans that i have tonight when i get off work. hopefully i have something with similar specs that i can test with before i order an M1A.Vaeltaja wrote:By trying it?
well, kinda. i got them from here, which i believe uses the same formula as radiate. even if the numbers are off, though, it seems that it might produce a decent comparison between my two overclocked scenarios. 25 watts doesn't sound like an unreasonable difference between a palomino @ 1.83ghz and 1.85v versus a thoroughbred @ 2.50ghz and 1.85v.Vaeltaja wrote:BTW, I seriously doubt your 1800+ @ 2.5GHz would generate 125W heat. Am I correct in assuming that you got that number from Radiate? I think Radiate's figures are a bit.. generous.
what core voltage were you using? i've run mine perfectly stable at 2.20ghz and 1.60v with my L1A.Vaeltaja wrote:As I said, I've ran the 1700+ @ 2.4GHz with a 19CFM 80mm fan with an SLK-900. I would imagine that the SLK-800 would fare roughly the same, and maybe even better when coupled with a better fan.
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 12:23 pm
- Location: Northern California by way of Finland
That I'm not sure about. From all I hear a Palomino runs significantly hotter than a Thoroughbred, so given the same voltage and all I would think they'd produce about the same heat. But that's just a shot-in-the-dark guess.. I'm too lazy to look through AMD's papers right now to figure out what the baseline difference iswell, kinda. i got them from here, which i believe uses the same formula as radiate. even if the numbers are off, though, it seems that it might produce a decent comparison between my two overclocked scenarios. 25 watts doesn't sound like an unreasonable difference between a palomino @ 1.83ghz and 1.85v versus a thoroughbred @ 2.50ghz and 1.85v.
Maybe shoot a question at Overclockers.com forums asking this?
2.5V above stock, which in our case translates into 1.85V (we've the DUT3C processors; stock is 1.6V). One of the processors does 2.4GHz with lower voltage, but +2.5V is a nice baseline..what core voltage were you using? i've run mine perfectly stable at 2.20ghz and 1.60v with my L1A.
-
- Friend of SPCR
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2002 5:07 pm
- Location: London, UK
we can have speed and quiet, can't we?? i'm thinking that 3500+ might be a little bit of a conservative rating; maybe amd should take a hint? the chip is perfectly stable at 1.85v and 166*15, but that was tested with a delta 80mm 80cfm fan! i really need to find a reasonable fan to keep this thing cool....ez2remember wrote:Are you sure you guys are in the right forums? LOL.
2.5Ghz Athlons must be atleast XP3500+?
How about getting a 80mm-120mm adaptor and sticking 120mm fan instead, that way you can be sure you have enough cfm.