Round or Square duct ?
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
Round or Square duct ?
Hi all,
I've been playing around with ducts (and finally getting rid of them... anyways...) and I'm wondering if having a round-section duct or a square-section duct makes any difference in either airflow or noise ???
I tend to think that a square section leading to a round propeler is a waste of space and it creates more turbulence and therefore noise. On the other hand, reviews of round shaped commercial ducts indicate that the airflow is also impeded...So is a round tube-like shape really better ?
Any thoughts or direct experience on that ?
I've been playing around with ducts (and finally getting rid of them... anyways...) and I'm wondering if having a round-section duct or a square-section duct makes any difference in either airflow or noise ???
I tend to think that a square section leading to a round propeler is a waste of space and it creates more turbulence and therefore noise. On the other hand, reviews of round shaped commercial ducts indicate that the airflow is also impeded...So is a round tube-like shape really better ?
Any thoughts or direct experience on that ?
If the round duct diameter is the same as the height/width of a square duct, there will be more pressure drop through the round duct just because of the extra area in the corners of the square duct. But you are right, there will be more turbulence (and maybe noise) because of the transition into the fan.
I am feeling nerdy today (and I am bored at work) so here goes...
I don't have a fan to measure here, so the dimensions are nominal. Assuming 50 CFM of air, here are some estimates...
Square - 120 mm X 120 mm (4.72"x4.72")
Velocity = 323 FPM
Pressure Drop = 0.043" w.c./100 ft
Round - 120 mm dia (4.72" dia)
Velocity = 411 FPM
Pressure Drop = 0.078" w.c./100 ft
So, for just the duct, those extra corners of area really add up.
But, since in a computer we are dealing with very short distances, the fittings will account for most of the pressure drop.
If we compare a 1 ft section of duct (pressure drop = 0.00043) with a transition from square to round (with a 1/8" radius for the fan inlet, pressure drop = 0.019), the transition has about 45 times more pressure drop across it than the duct does.
So, I guess that means that unless you have a LOT of duct, the round duct would be better.
I am feeling nerdy today (and I am bored at work) so here goes...
I don't have a fan to measure here, so the dimensions are nominal. Assuming 50 CFM of air, here are some estimates...
Square - 120 mm X 120 mm (4.72"x4.72")
Velocity = 323 FPM
Pressure Drop = 0.043" w.c./100 ft
Round - 120 mm dia (4.72" dia)
Velocity = 411 FPM
Pressure Drop = 0.078" w.c./100 ft
So, for just the duct, those extra corners of area really add up.
But, since in a computer we are dealing with very short distances, the fittings will account for most of the pressure drop.
If we compare a 1 ft section of duct (pressure drop = 0.00043) with a transition from square to round (with a 1/8" radius for the fan inlet, pressure drop = 0.019), the transition has about 45 times more pressure drop across it than the duct does.
So, I guess that means that unless you have a LOT of duct, the round duct would be better.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
- Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
- Contact:
Using some lessons from woodworking dust collection...
I'd guess you can get some improvement (in airflow - maybe not silence) by working on the transitions. A flat surface like the outside of the computer with a hard edge that is connected to a duct will impede the airflow. A much better design is to have a gradual transition w/ a large as radius as possible into the duct.
Does it matter in a computer? No idea and I don't have the equipment to test it. With power tools, you can possibly see a 5-10% airflow change when switching to a gradual entry into the duct.
Is it practical in a computer? Probably not. It would hard to enlarge all the fan entry holes enough to get any kind of gradual entry into the duct.
I'd guess you can get some improvement (in airflow - maybe not silence) by working on the transitions. A flat surface like the outside of the computer with a hard edge that is connected to a duct will impede the airflow. A much better design is to have a gradual transition w/ a large as radius as possible into the duct.
Does it matter in a computer? No idea and I don't have the equipment to test it. With power tools, you can possibly see a 5-10% airflow change when switching to a gradual entry into the duct.
Is it practical in a computer? Probably not. It would hard to enlarge all the fan entry holes enough to get any kind of gradual entry into the duct.
My preference is to avoid ducts altogether. Instead, I use partitions to make airflow go where I want. A duct is like a tunnel, but a partition is like a wall with an open doorway.
A partition splits up the case into two halves; so long as all of the "intakes" are on one side and all of the "exhausts" are on the other side, then airflow will be forced through the open doorway. That doorway is where my CPU heatsink is.
I don't have any quantitative measurements, but I found switching to partitions instead of ducts improved airflow and reduced airflow noise.
A partition splits up the case into two halves; so long as all of the "intakes" are on one side and all of the "exhausts" are on the other side, then airflow will be forced through the open doorway. That doorway is where my CPU heatsink is.
I don't have any quantitative measurements, but I found switching to partitions instead of ducts improved airflow and reduced airflow noise.