Fanless heatsink for nVidia 6800 series?
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
-
- Posts: 1386
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 6:53 pm
Fanless heatsink for nVidia 6800 series?
Anybody knows if there are any fanless heatsinks available for nVidia 6800 series right now or in the nearest future? We know that Arctic Silencer will be coming out with a new revision of their cooler (which although not fanless will be extremely quiet) compatible with ATI X800PRO/XT. However now that nVidia has finally caught up with ATI in terms of performance, I'm reevaluating my choices for the next videocard. 6800GT is priced about the same as X800PRO, but it has 16 pipelines instead of 12 so it is much faster on most of the games. Of course noise is still the biggest concern to me - I'd rather settle for half of the perpormance than for half the noise increase.
So for now we have two probable contendands:
Zalman 80D
+fanless
-still no reliable information if it will be compatible with 6800
-less than optimal construction and heat dissapation, may need an optional fan
-as a result it will heat up case a lot
AeroCool VM101 cooler
+fanless
+excellent heatsink positioning on the top of the videocard right by the rear outtake fans
+as a result will not heat up case temperature a lot because the hot air will be sucked out by the natural airflow
-once again, no reliable information if it will be compatible with 6800
-only 70Watt of heat disappation, AFAIK 6800 series generate much more heat than that
Any thoughts?
So for now we have two probable contendands:
Zalman 80D
+fanless
-still no reliable information if it will be compatible with 6800
-less than optimal construction and heat dissapation, may need an optional fan
-as a result it will heat up case a lot
AeroCool VM101 cooler
+fanless
+excellent heatsink positioning on the top of the videocard right by the rear outtake fans
+as a result will not heat up case temperature a lot because the hot air will be sucked out by the natural airflow
-once again, no reliable information if it will be compatible with 6800
-only 70Watt of heat disappation, AFAIK 6800 series generate much more heat than that
Any thoughts?
I'm not sure I would conclude that the 6800 outperforms the X800. The performance is neck-and-neck, depending upon which benchmarks you choose to go by, yet the 6800 produces 50% more heat.
50% more heat for maybe 5-10% more performance? Hmm.
But regardless of that, either one is going to be a lot of heat to deal with, on par with adding a second CPU to your case.
Any fanless solution, either from Zalman or Aerocool, is going to have the same effect on case temps as the stock cooler will. The heat is being dumped inside the case, which will result in higher case, cpu and psu temps. That will requir more airflow to stay cool, and result in more noise.
A solution which gets the heat outside the case as directly and quietly as possible seems like a better idea.
50% more heat for maybe 5-10% more performance? Hmm.
But regardless of that, either one is going to be a lot of heat to deal with, on par with adding a second CPU to your case.
Any fanless solution, either from Zalman or Aerocool, is going to have the same effect on case temps as the stock cooler will. The heat is being dumped inside the case, which will result in higher case, cpu and psu temps. That will requir more airflow to stay cool, and result in more noise.
A solution which gets the heat outside the case as directly and quietly as possible seems like a better idea.
That email came on June 22nd, so it will hopefully be available around the end of July. In a separate email to HIS, however, a representative stated that the X800 XT IceQ II will be available in mid July. Given that it seems to use the VGA Silencer Revision 4, make of it what you will...No.
But we will have the ATI Silencer 4 for all X800 boards. Available in
about 6-7 weeks.
Best Regards
___________________________________
ARCTIC COOLING Support
Magnus Huber
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Tyrdium [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Samstag, 19. Juni 2004 19:57
An: [email protected]
Betreff: VGA Silencer Rev. 4
To Arctic Cooling:
Is there an estimated release date for the VGA Silencer Revision 4?
Also, will the Revision 3 VGA Silencer work with an X800 XT Platinum
Edition (running at stock speeds), or will only the Revision 4 work?
Thanks in advance for your help.
-
- Posts: 1386
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 6:53 pm
Performance wise 6800GT not only beats the hell out of X800PRO but also approaches 6800Ultra/X800XT performance. 6800GT IMO is a jewel, not too terribly expensive while still almost as fast as the top of the line videocards, especially when overclocked.
Any fanless solution, either from Zalman or Aerocool, is going to have the same effect on case temps as the stock cooler will.
Not exactly, and this is why I love AeroCool design.
1.It dumps the hot air above videocard, not below, which helps the videocard to stay cooler.
2.It also dumps the hot air very close to the rear outtake fans, which makes it much easier to remove it from the case, thus lowering overall case temperatures.
3.Unlike Zalman 80D heatsink with an additional fan installed, AeroCool does not mess with the case airflow. With aerocool the air naturally enters front of the case and exits at the back taking the heat away from the GPU heatsink on its way. 80D fan however blows some of the air towards the front of the case, thus preventing the natural case airflow...
Of course I know that 6800/X800 generates enormous enount of heat, but one still hopes... Besides I don't really want to spend $200 for an outdated videocard and another $20-40 for a third-party heatsink when I can get a new-generation card which is twice as fast in the new games for only $50 more. Doesn't really makes sense, doesn't it?
Tyrdium
I know about Silencer 4 - I wrote about it in the very first post. However 6800GT is a lot faster than X800PRO and I think nobody is going to argue that nVidia still has much better drivers.
Any fanless solution, either from Zalman or Aerocool, is going to have the same effect on case temps as the stock cooler will.
Not exactly, and this is why I love AeroCool design.
1.It dumps the hot air above videocard, not below, which helps the videocard to stay cooler.
2.It also dumps the hot air very close to the rear outtake fans, which makes it much easier to remove it from the case, thus lowering overall case temperatures.
3.Unlike Zalman 80D heatsink with an additional fan installed, AeroCool does not mess with the case airflow. With aerocool the air naturally enters front of the case and exits at the back taking the heat away from the GPU heatsink on its way. 80D fan however blows some of the air towards the front of the case, thus preventing the natural case airflow...
Of course I know that 6800/X800 generates enormous enount of heat, but one still hopes... Besides I don't really want to spend $200 for an outdated videocard and another $20-40 for a third-party heatsink when I can get a new-generation card which is twice as fast in the new games for only $50 more. Doesn't really makes sense, doesn't it?
Tyrdium
I know about Silencer 4 - I wrote about it in the very first post. However 6800GT is a lot faster than X800PRO and I think nobody is going to argue that nVidia still has much better drivers.
-
- Posts: 1386
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 6:53 pm
Well, I've read it at ixbt.com, dunno if any other websites have tested GT, you can read english version here.
Don't forget that 6800GT is closer to 6800ULTRA as it also has 16 pipelines, than to regular 6800. Essentially 6800GT is underclocked 6800ULTRA.
Don't forget that 6800GT is closer to 6800ULTRA as it also has 16 pipelines, than to regular 6800. Essentially 6800GT is underclocked 6800ULTRA.
Ok, this is completely useless, but just for comparison: If you add up all the percentage difference in scores between the 6800gt and the x800pro in the link you posted, and then divide by the number of scores....you get an average increase in performance of 9%.
A 9% improvement, in exchange for 50% more heat.
You may want to hold off on a purchase of that Aerocool cooler for a little while, there's a review in the works.
A 9% improvement, in exchange for 50% more heat.
You may want to hold off on a purchase of that Aerocool cooler for a little while, there's a review in the works.
I wouldn't say that passive cooling of a 6800 is out of the question: NvNews report on Galaxy 6800
Advisable....maybe not. Possible...yes.
Advisable....maybe not. Possible...yes.
The 6800 runs at a core clock faster than the GT, and within 50mhz of the Ultra. The big differences within the line are the memory types and their speeds. (128 of DDR1 on the 6800, to 256 of GDDR3 on the Ultra) That's where the big performance differences are..the core itself is identical.
The core heat is the big issue, the RAM doesn't contribute much. (In fact the DDR3 is supposed to be significantly cooler)
If it will cool a 6800, it'll cool a GT, and probably an Ultra. I'd be willing to bet that Zalman is a member of Nvidia's developer group, and thus knew the wattage of the upcoming product lines. It would seem silly for them to develop an upgrade from their existing HP-80, and not design it to cool the products that they knew were on the horizon.
The core heat is the big issue, the RAM doesn't contribute much. (In fact the DDR3 is supposed to be significantly cooler)
If it will cool a 6800, it'll cool a GT, and probably an Ultra. I'd be willing to bet that Zalman is a member of Nvidia's developer group, and thus knew the wattage of the upcoming product lines. It would seem silly for them to develop an upgrade from their existing HP-80, and not design it to cool the products that they knew were on the horizon.
-
- Posts: 1386
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 6:53 pm
Rusty075
Thanks for the link. BTW, did you look at the Galaxy's website? They have a very intriguing flash animation, and it seems that the new arctic silencer will be compatible with nVidia cards too! It's good to know that now the top of the line nVidia cards can be run quiet too.
Thanks for the link. BTW, did you look at the Galaxy's website? They have a very intriguing flash animation, and it seems that the new arctic silencer will be compatible with nVidia cards too! It's good to know that now the top of the line nVidia cards can be run quiet too.
I was under the impression that the 6800 core was a GT/Ultra core with 4 of the 16 pipes disabled (ie. the dies in which 1 quad has a defect). So one might naively assume 75% of the heat output at the same clock.Rusty075 wrote:The 6800 runs at a core clock faster than the GT, and within 50mhz of the Ultra. The big differences within the line are the memory types and their speeds. (128 of DDR1 on the 6800, to 256 of GDDR3 on the Ultra) That's where the big performance differences are..the core itself is identical.
You're right about the RAM, DDR1 and DDR3 are heaps better than DDR2 wrt heat output.
Anyway, I'm not going to bicker (any more than I already have ), I hope you're right and that a fully passive Zalman is possible for a GT (which is the card I've got my eye on).
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 10:49 am
I think I saw one pic (from Computex?) where two versions of the new VGA Silencer (is that rev. 4?) were shown; one for ATI, one for nVidia.Rusty075 wrote:Yeah, I did cruise their site...no pics of the zalman-equipped one though.
I hope that means that the Silencer will be 6800 compatible too, but I guess it could be a custom version made just for them. Time will tell
Cheers,
Jan
That would truly suck. (there's my technical analysis of having separate Ati and Nvidia models)
Arctic Cooling needs to come up with a mounting mechanism that will work with either one, or package each silencer with an interchangeable mechanism. (like Zalman does)
Ideally there would eventually a standardized GPU HS mounting mechanism....but that's really, really unlikely to ever happen, for a variety of reasons.
Arctic Cooling needs to come up with a mounting mechanism that will work with either one, or package each silencer with an interchangeable mechanism. (like Zalman does)
Ideally there would eventually a standardized GPU HS mounting mechanism....but that's really, really unlikely to ever happen, for a variety of reasons.
1. Most reports I've heard have the X800 in the mid 60's under load and the GT in the mid 70's.Rusty075 wrote:Ok, this is completely useless, but just for comparison: If you add up all the percentage difference in scores between the 6800gt and the x800pro in the link you posted, and then divide by the number of scores....you get an average increase in performance of 9%.
A 9% improvement, in exchange for 50% more heat.
2. So far everybody I heard of who's tried has OC'd the GT to Ultra speeds whereas the X800 is barely OCing for most, so you should compare the Ultra benchies to get a realworld comparison for us enthusiasts.
3. NVidia drivers are wonders. They brought the 5900 from languishing to competitive. ATI's driver releases obviously also increase performance, but not nearly as much, historically, as NVidia's.
If I'm wrong about the heat, then I'd like to know. Also, this is all pointless as either card is rediculously powerful...but arguing the minutia is what makes us geeks, so.
-
- Patron of SPCR
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 9:57 pm
- Location: Berkeley, CA, USA
- Contact:
I agree with this; it's a fact. It is somewhat faster, but at a terrible cost for quiet enthusiasts: massive increase in heat output.A 9% improvement, in exchange for 50% more heat.
Just look at the wattage numbers quoted in the original reviews at tech-report, tomshardware, anand, etc. They all show the same results: nVidia eats a LOT more power.
You just have to decide what's more important to you. I do agree the 6800 is clearly better tech this time around, though..
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 10:49 am
-
- Posts: 1386
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 6:53 pm
OK, I emailed both zalman and arctic silencer support inquiring if they will support nVidia 6800 anytime soon and here's what they had to say.
Zalman
And Arctic Silence:
Well, all in all, I think it's good news - at least we know that it will be possible to quiet down modern videocards to an acceptable level, even if we'll have to wait couple of months...
Zalman
Good news, it seems that zalman will put out a new cooler specifically for 6800, let's just hope it won't be too expensive seeing that they had to design it specifically for 6800. No precise date is available...Hello,
Thanks for your kind enquiry. Actually, ZM80D-HP is not compatible with nVidia 6800series because of no mounting hole for our cooler in the card. Currently we are working on an installation package for that card and its release will be posted in our website when it is done. So, please be patient for a while.
Best regards,
Support/ Zalman
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 2:21 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: ZM80D-HP nvidia6800 compability?
???? : xxx
???뼓PAN lang=EN-US> : Hello,
I'm planning to purchase nVIdia 6800 series video card but I also want to keep the noise down. Have you tested the new ZM80D-HP video-card cooler with the nVidia 6800 series? Is it compatible with the 6800 lineup?
Thank you, xxx
And Arctic Silence:
So it seems Arctic Silencer is also working on a cooler for nVidia 6800. Once again, it seems that 6800 has different mounting holes, so they'll have to build an entirely new cooler. I'm a little sceptical about 6 weeks date since they said it will take they 4 weeks to put out a cooler for 800pro/xt and it still isn't here.1. yes
2. No there will be just one mode, since a lot of VGA cards have
already
a thermal control onboard. It will be 2 to 3 times quieter than the
stock cooler.
3. They will be available in about 6 weeks.
Best Regards
___________________________________
ARCTIC COOLING Support
Magnus Huber
-----Urspr?he Nachricht-----
Von: xxx xxx [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. Juli 2004 03:52
An: help
Betreff: Re: AW: Arctic Silencer rev4 for nvidia6800?
Dear Magnus,
Could you please elaborate more on your previous
reply?
1.Will any of the upcoming coolers support nVidia 6800
cards?
2.How loud are they going to be? Will they have a
silent mode just like Arctic Silencer Rev2/3?
3.What's the approximate launch date?
Thank you, xxx
--- help <[email protected]> wrote:
> We will also have 5 new coolers for Nvidia cards.
>
> Best Regards
> ___________________________________
>
> ARCTIC COOLING Support
> Magnus Huber
>
>
>
> -----Urspr?he Nachricht-----
> Von: xxx xxx [mailto:[email protected]]
> Gesendet: Samstag, 10. Juli 2004 07:07
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Arctic Silencer rev4 for nvidia6800?
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I know from reading on the forums that you are
> planning to release a new revision of arctic
> silencer video-card cooler
> (rev4) that will be compatible with ATI X800Pro/XT
> cards. However, I
> prefer nVidia, so I was wondering - will this new
> revision also support
> nVidia 6800 lineup? And if so when will the new
> product become
> available?
>
> Thank you, xxx
Well, all in all, I think it's good news - at least we know that it will be possible to quiet down modern videocards to an acceptable level, even if we'll have to wait couple of months...
I can speak from first hand experience. I have a BFG 6800GT, these suckers do run very very hot and there fans are very loud compared to the ATI 9800XT which I had before this. The 6800GT's fan loves to stay in medium-high mode even when your in 2D mode just surfing the net. So unless one of the new artic cooling vga silencers fit the 6800GT, it will be going back when the X800XT Platniums are in stock.
I have never had a BFG card, but I did have a vision with an Arctic Silencer V3, an eVGA 5700 ultra and my Dremil. The stock fan was loud and inefficient, which made the card run in the low 60s under load. Now, it runs in the low 40s and the case temp has dropped 5 deg. The fan is hardly audible, on high, in my Aria case. I am sold on Arctic Silencer and eagerly await the official release of their NV product line. In short, if BFG's Stock cooling is anything like eVGA's then their should be a huge improvement with Arctic's after market cooler.
-
- Posts: 1386
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 6:53 pm
Heh... Looks more like a 52% improvement to me... Even beats 800XTRusty075 wrote:A 9% improvement, in exchange for 50% more heat.
-
- Patron of SPCR
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 9:57 pm
- Location: Berkeley, CA, USA
- Contact:
Seems true enough. The difference is fairly substantial (50 percent!) for the "low end" X800 pro and the 6800gt.That said, it looks as if ATI's decision to scale their current line of flagship video cards by crippling the Radeon X800Pro’s graphics pipelines to 12 pipes, instead of the 16 pipes of the Radeon X800XT-PE might have been a bad move, at least in terms of satisfying DOOM 3 players. NVIDIA on the other hand chose to scale from their Ultra to GT models by only decreasing the clock speed of the GPUs. The NVIDIA 6800GT certainly stood out among the crowd as its DOOM 3 framerates continually outpaced the Radeon X800XT-PE that currently has a list price that is $100 more than the GeForce 6800GT. NVIDIA has told us more than once that the 6800 series was “designed to play DOOM 3,” and the truth of that statement is now glaringly obvious.
Tweaked or not, what matters is the end product.
I don't care if nVidia payed iD thousands of dollars to deliberately cripple ATi's performance, I'll buy whatever makes the game run best and screw corporate politics.
Fact: The corporation does not care about you. It does not care about video games. It cares about making money any way it can. Wether it takes the sleezy route or the less sleezy route, all it wants is the money out your pocket.
Either way, they're going to take it, so I might as well get something that works, instead of what some bizarre sense of ethics deems to be the 'right' choice.
I don't care if nVidia payed iD thousands of dollars to deliberately cripple ATi's performance, I'll buy whatever makes the game run best and screw corporate politics.
Fact: The corporation does not care about you. It does not care about video games. It cares about making money any way it can. Wether it takes the sleezy route or the less sleezy route, all it wants is the money out your pocket.
Either way, they're going to take it, so I might as well get something that works, instead of what some bizarre sense of ethics deems to be the 'right' choice.
-
- Posts: 1386
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 6:53 pm
1.Who cares if they are tweaked? As long as those tweaks do not affect picture quality I'm all for tweaked...Rusty075 wrote:...Ah, I love the smell of tweaked drivers in the morning.
2.Why can't ATI tweak their drivers for Doom3?
In any case 6800GT is a sweet piece of hardware, at least as fast as 800PRO sometimes approaching 6800ULTRA/X800XT level, relatively inexpensive (as inexpensive as a high-end card can be) and has excellent drivers. And you should consider that 6800 series is already becoming widely available while ATI still struggles to put any of its new cards on the market. If 6800GT can be cooled effectively with Arctic Silencer this would be the card to get. That said, considering the cost of an aftermarket videocard cooler upgrade, the $370 asking price for GT is still a little high for me, I'm probably gonna wait till the price comes down to 300ish and for the reviews of new Arctic Silencer, see if it's as quiet as Rev3 and if it can cool GT adequately.
BTW when is the Aerocool review coming out?