Samsung Spinpoint T - 300 & 400 GB

Silencing hard drives, optical drives and other storage devices

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Mats
Posts: 3044
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 6:54 am
Location: Sweden

Samsung Spinpoint T - 300 & 400 GB

Post by Mats » Tue Nov 08, 2005 1:14 am

I've seen these starting to show up here in Sweden (In stock in 6 stores). Does anybody know anything about them?
It must have been a year since I heard that Samsung would go for 133 x 3 HD's, maybe they're finally showing up?

Edit: Changed title.
Last edited by Mats on Tue Nov 08, 2005 5:06 am, edited 2 times in total.

notareal
Posts: 67
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:03 am
Location: Finland

Post by notareal » Tue Nov 08, 2005 4:52 am

SpinPoint T HD400LJ
"...a drive that is so quiet, YOU WON'T EVEN KNOW IT IS THERE." 8) Can't wait the review!

Mats
Posts: 3044
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 6:54 am
Location: Sweden

Post by Mats » Tue Nov 08, 2005 5:02 am

Haha, how could I miss that? I checked their site but didn't see any.
I'll edit the title.

Mats
Posts: 3044
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 6:54 am
Location: Sweden

Post by Mats » Tue Nov 08, 2005 5:14 am

The 300GB IDE model seems like the only one available so far, just checked Germany. One more platter and 50 GB more than the 250 GB model, I guess I'll wait for the 400 GB version.

mattek
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 5:52 am
Location: Sweden

Post by mattek » Wed Nov 23, 2005 3:23 am

Why IDE? Give me SATA. After using SATA cables I'll never go back to IDE.

/mattek
The Rig: Sonata II with removed duct, AMD3700 + Zalman, 2GB RAM, RAID-1 2x250GB Spinpoint + 200GB Spinpoint, 7800GTX + VF-700Cu, 2xADDA with FanMate.

JazzJackRabbit
Posts: 1386
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 6:53 pm

Post by JazzJackRabbit » Wed Nov 23, 2005 11:48 pm

Good news. Up until now only seagate was the only viable alternative for high capacity hard drives but they have this annoying self diagnostic sound. SpinPoint might cure that. I'd like to see a 400Gb SATA spinpoint sold at a reasonable price. Unfortunately even 250Gb SATA spinpoint is nowhere to be found in US, I fear it will be even worse with the new models.

jermaink
Posts: 265
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:20 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by jermaink » Thu Nov 24, 2005 8:11 am

I've seen a review which clamed the new 400GB 16MB cache Western Digital HDD was supposed to be pretty quick and quiet.

Anyone here had a look at one of those?

miTchy
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 6:14 pm

Post by miTchy » Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:16 pm

i need this
[email protected] - Tuniq Tower 120 - ASUS P5K - 4GB Crucial - 1TB Hitachi in Smart Drive 2002 - 8800gts - Corsair 520HX - Antec Solo Acoustipacked

Mats
Posts: 3044
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 6:54 am
Location: Sweden

Post by Mats » Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:43 pm

Still only 300 GB here in Sweden, both internal and external though.

400 GB have showed up in Germany, both IDE and SATA.

Still no reviews? :?

Mats
Posts: 3044
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 6:54 am
Location: Sweden

Post by Mats » Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:00 pm

Here's a review from Ixbt (russian), and one from THG (weellll.... :roll: ).

Slow and low noise they say. I don't know if the performance have to do with the platter density.

Ixbt repports the older 200 GB version as slower than the 250 GB. Will it be the same with the 400 GB being the faster one? We'll see, just speculating here.

andyb
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Essex, England

Post by andyb » Fri Feb 17, 2006 2:56 am

RE: THG Performance analysis.

Like most experienced IT Nerds/Engineers I take everything THG say with a handfull of salt.

The drives they tested might very well be early Firmware that works but very slowly, I have witnessed this several times before in reviews.

I will wait for another review before beleiving the drives are that slow.

For Samsung to have got a 300GB drive, they either need 2 x 150GB Platter (which they dont have, 3 * 100GB Platters (likely), 3 133GB Platters that are "short" i.e. they dont use all of the space on the platter, but what they do use is 133GB density, or 3 * 133GB Platters and only use 5 heads AND slightly shorter platters.

3 * 100GB Platters are likely as for the P120 series they are already manufacturing 100GB for the 200GB model.

The 400GB Model is the one to buy, it will be faster, and WONT be any noisier than the 300GB model.


Andy
Main PC, P180, CM Silent Pro 500M, i5 3570k @ 4.2Ghz, 8-GB @ 2,400MHz, 512GB 850 EVO, 500 Extreme II, 2x 2.5" drives, MSI 660Ti Twin Frozr.
Server, under reconstruction, 380W Enermax Pro82+, positive pressure only.

andyb
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Essex, England

Post by andyb » Tue Jun 27, 2006 3:31 am

Just been browsing for HDD's, and I spotted the 400GB SATA Samsung in stock at OC UK for £30 less than the Seagate.

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/acatalog/ ... _SATA.html

I know this thread has not been touched since February, but I would like to ressurect it in the hope that someone has a 400GB Samsung HD400LJ and can give their experiences of that drive.

I dont need a drive right now, but I will need one at some point in the future and this drive is on my short list.

I refuse to touch anything made by Maxtor, WD, or Hitachi, so Samsung or Seagate are my choices.

My list of drives is in my Sig, I currently have about 40GB of spare space, but that will change as I dont have everything backed up.

The chances are that I will replace my 200GB 7200.7 SATA, its not the noisiest, thats the 300GB 7200.8 SATA, the point is that I will gain 200GB of space, and not gain another drive (I have 4). 3 of my drives spend most of their time idling anyway, and my boot drive is (arguably) the quietest of the 4 drives.


Andy
Main PC, P180, CM Silent Pro 500M, i5 3570k @ 4.2Ghz, 8-GB @ 2,400MHz, 512GB 850 EVO, 500 Extreme II, 2x 2.5" drives, MSI 660Ti Twin Frozr.
Server, under reconstruction, 380W Enermax Pro82+, positive pressure only.

andyb
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Essex, England

Post by andyb » Wed Jun 28, 2006 3:28 am

Im bumping this thread.

Someone on the SPCR forums must have one of these drives.


Andy
Main PC, P180, CM Silent Pro 500M, i5 3570k @ 4.2Ghz, 8-GB @ 2,400MHz, 512GB 850 EVO, 500 Extreme II, 2x 2.5" drives, MSI 660Ti Twin Frozr.
Server, under reconstruction, 380W Enermax Pro82+, positive pressure only.

chdude3
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:04 pm
Location: Canada

Post by chdude3 » Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:12 am

I'm waiting too, Andy. Not sure I'll be able to afford to shell out for the 400gig, but I'd like a respected opinion on the drive to compare to the 300 - maybe it would be worth it!

Haven't found the 400 available in Canada though, yet.

BillyBuerger
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 852
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 1:49 pm
Location: Somerset, WI - USA
Contact:

Post by BillyBuerger » Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:39 am

I have the 300GB model. But I didn't do a thorough analysis of the accoustics. It's in my file server which is not quiet but sits in my laundry room behind closed doors. I did plug it in before putting it in my server to have a quick listen. Definitly not as quite as my P80. The idles were a bit more harsh. I didn't load it up so I can't comment on the seeks. Maybe I'll have to pull it out again sometime and have a good listen to it.

smilingcrow
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 1809
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 1:45 am
Location: At Home

Post by smilingcrow » Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:13 am

According to the figures on Samsung’s website and to subjective reports, these are noisier than the P120s. As for performance, the specs look almost identical on paper, with the 400GB having a slightly higher density (133 v 125) but not supporting NCQ.
As for the Tomshardware review, did it state that it was using beta firmware or is that speculation! It does show an unusually poor performance considering its specs though.
BillyBuerger wrote:I have the 300GB model. But I didn't do a thorough analysis of the accoustics…
Any chance of running DiskBench on the drive so that we can get an idea of the transfer rate? I have a P120 250GB SATA drive that we can compare it against. Try running it on the fastest and slowest partitions that it has, assuming that it has multiple partitions.

andyb
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Essex, England

Post by andyb » Thu Jun 29, 2006 2:12 am

Samsung drives seem to get a little quieter after 1-2 weeks of usage, mine did.

Billy you might very well find that the T range is only a little louder than the P range, and thats due to the extra platter, I would imagine the seeks are still pleasant as the platter density is the same.

Having thought about this for a while, Samsung might have a new range on their way, as everyone else has 160-188GB platters. A perpendicular samsung with 3 platters would a a good choice, has anyone heard anything from Samsung about larger capacity drives.


Andy
Main PC, P180, CM Silent Pro 500M, i5 3570k @ 4.2Ghz, 8-GB @ 2,400MHz, 512GB 850 EVO, 500 Extreme II, 2x 2.5" drives, MSI 660Ti Twin Frozr.
Server, under reconstruction, 380W Enermax Pro82+, positive pressure only.

alfred
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:32 pm

Post by alfred » Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:49 am

Had my Samsung HD401LJ delivered this morning. Pics here http://idlenoise.ifrance.com/recordings/pictures/
I'm going to do a few noise recording tests and compare it with a SP2504C. Short performance tests too
Last edited by alfred on Fri Jul 07, 2006 3:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

andyb
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Essex, England

Post by andyb » Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:33 am

Fantastic, I will look forward to your findings.

I am guessing that this drive will get a little quieter over the next 2 weeks, like all of the other Samsungs seem to do.


Andy
Main PC, P180, CM Silent Pro 500M, i5 3570k @ 4.2Ghz, 8-GB @ 2,400MHz, 512GB 850 EVO, 500 Extreme II, 2x 2.5" drives, MSI 660Ti Twin Frozr.
Server, under reconstruction, 380W Enermax Pro82+, positive pressure only.

chdude3
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:04 pm
Location: Canada

Post by chdude3 » Thu Jul 06, 2006 4:20 am

Thanks Alfred - I am looking forward to your findings!

BillyBuerger
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 852
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 1:49 pm
Location: Somerset, WI - USA
Contact:

Post by BillyBuerger » Thu Jul 06, 2006 4:43 am

smilingcrow wrote:Any chance of running DiskBench on the drive so that we can get an idea of the transfer rate? I have a P120 250GB SATA drive that we can compare it against. Try running it on the fastest and slowest partitions that it has, assuming that it has multiple partitions.
I have it in my Linux server. So DskBench won't work. It's a linux partition too so I can't just plug it into a windows machine. Hopefully Alfred's tests will be more helpful.

alfred
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:32 pm

Post by alfred » Thu Jul 06, 2006 6:43 am

I've uploaded some benchmark results on http://idlenoise.ifrance.com/benchmarks/
Test platform is an Asus A8N-SLi motherboard, X2 2.0 GHz (3800+) cpu overclocked at 2.6 GHz (~5000+); using nVidia nForce4 for IDE and SATA2 connections.

As you can see, the HD401LJ performs very well; slightly above SP2514N. This is a confirmation that HD300LD/LJ gets bad benchmark results (see online reviews) because it only uses 100 GB out of each 133 GB platter; a similar pattern as SP2004C vs SP2504C.

The temperatures you see on my HDtune screen captures are what I got after about 2 hours running all the benchmarks; both drives were put in Nexus Drive-a-Way enclosures. The case doesn't give any significant airflow around these enclosures, and it's a very hot summer day today in Brussels (32°C ambient when benchmarking), so these temps give us some indication about how cool these Samsung drives are when running disk-intensive tasks for a long time. Now I'm finished with the benchmarks, the SP2514N has stabilized at 43°C and the HD401LJ at 45°C; all temps reported by SMART feature.

AAM was disabled on both drives for running the benchmarks.
Enabling AAM in FTool provides about the same, unspectacular improvement in seek noises for both drives; anyway both idle & seek noise are very low on these drives.

I'll have to wait for a quieter environment (= a sleepless night :)) to record idle and seek noises from both drives. I was surprised when plugging in the HD401LJ as it seemed easily as quiet or even a little quieter than any of my P120 series, both in idle and seek, while official Samsung dB/A values gives lower idle for the 2-platter. My SP2514N isn't having any noise problem (I've got 6 P120 drives actually, providing enough comparison points); so maybe I've been granted a cherry-picked HD401LJ, or maybe they're even better than what the specs suggest. My brand-new WD3200KS ? Beaten hands down...
Last edited by alfred on Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

winguy
Posts: 447
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:31 am

Post by winguy » Thu Jul 06, 2006 8:26 am

alfred,

those access times are rather slow for AAM disabled drives, you should be getting ~14.X instead. I suggest you check your setup/benches (nVidia IDE/Sata drivers at work?) again. :)

and if you do enable AAM, mind finding out the access times for both drives?


Oh, and it appears your SP2514N is running at the default ATA100 interface. You might want to try using Samsung's utility (this I believe) to set it to ATA133, since nForce4 does support ATA133.

alfred
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:32 pm

Post by alfred » Thu Jul 06, 2006 8:55 am

Well I'm no benchmarks specialist but I think Samsung drives usually get additional 1ms or 2ms in access time tests. Figures shown on c't w2benchw for example seem about in-line with online reviews. Enabling AAM on Samsung drives usually doesn't improve the results a lot.

I'm not gonna try to better any benchmark since it's not my main goal; I just did a quick check that the HD401LJ wasn't underperforming as the HD300 in some reviews I read a few months ago.

By the way if I've got something to improve I should focus on learning english, shouldn't I ? :D

chdude3
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:04 pm
Location: Canada

Post by chdude3 » Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:35 am

alfred wrote:By the way if I've got something to improve I should focus on learning english, shouldn't I ? :D
Non! Votre anglais est très bien! Merci pour l'information jusqu'ici. (Peut-être je devrais améliorer mon Français!)

Anyways, I'm interested in hearing idle/seek noise if you do get around to recording it - but it sounds like the 400gig drive might be the way to go. It's starting to trickle into Canada, and the price isn't outrageous thus far. I'll have to keep an eye on it.

mb2
Posts: 606
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 2:42 pm
Location: UK

Post by mb2 » Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:55 am

any reason u wouldn't go with the 500GB WD caviar if your looking for a quiet, high capacity drive now?
or are they significantly more expensive?
i3-530, Gigabyte H55M-D2H, CM hyper212+ | Sempron64 3000+, Biostar Tforce 6100, AC Freezer 7, picopsu. 0 fans.

alfred
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:32 pm

Post by alfred » Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:26 am

chdude3 > thanks.. nevertheless you managed to discover that my native language is french and not dutch (like about half of belgian people) :| By the way, your french is excellent. I'll try to make a recording asap, this should give a first look until we hopefully get the drive properly reviewed by the SPCR staff.

mb2 > I bought and tested a WD3200KS monday, see http://idlenoise.ifrance.com/recordings/
It has a low idle noise too, but I vastly prefer the idle noise signature of the Samsungs. I'm not selling the WD however, it's still very good for the capacity.

alfred
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:32 pm

Post by alfred » Fri Jul 07, 2006 3:28 am

My recording of the HD401LJ is available on http://idlenoise.ifrance.com/recordings/

When you first compare both Samsung drives recordings, you may think there's more mid-high freqs presence in the HD401LJ recording compared to the SP2504C; however there is not. What's different is that the low freqs presence is lower for the HD401LJ; mid-high freqs are about the same level and signature. So when you switch from SP2504C to HD401LJ, the low freqs energy is reduced and subjectively you hear mid-high freqs higher : the "overall tone" moves higher in frequency, but actually not in amplitude (I checked this on graphs).

I always had the feeling that idle noise was lowered from P80 to P120; I now discover the same improvement here from P120 to T133.

Seek noise has been improved too on the HD401LJ, compared to P120; it's muted way better, but tends to result in an additive (related to idle) noise signature that is more on mid-high frequencies rather than low-mid freqs as for the P120.

These excellent first findings should be moderated as I have no idea if the HD401LJ will suffer from as high a sample variance as the P120 seemed to have, according to multiple posts. Only thing I can say is that I didn't suffer from this sample variance, all of my six P120 having very similar noise signatures and noise levels.

v3n
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 3:48 am
Location: UK

Post by v3n » Sat Jul 15, 2006 7:41 am

My new HD400LD has arrived from OCUK :)

Compared to my suspended p80 and p120 drives which I only ever hear the seeks off I agree with Alfred that they are slightly muted on this newer model.

Temp wise I noticed it runs a few degree's C cooler in open air than my Maxtor DM+9 and 7200.7

Im happy with it initially and havent added AAM yet

Need to get it suspended too ASAP 8)
Antec 3700BQE (AcoustiPack� BQE3700 Kit) E8200 @ 3.8ghz 1.3v ¬ MSI P35 Neo2
Ballistix 5300 @ 475mhz 2.1v 4-4-4-12
TH2GO @ 3840x1024 + 3x LG L1954TQ ~ 8800GTS 512mb

Techno Pride
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:57 am

Post by Techno Pride » Sat Jul 15, 2006 6:07 pm

alfred wrote:Had my Samsung HD401LJ delivered this morning. Pics here http://idlenoise.ifrance.com/recordings/pictures/
I'm going to do a few noise recording tests and compare it with a SP2504C. Short performance tests too
is it just me or does the pcb look el'cheapo?
Antec Solo II
i7-2600S, GA-Z68XP-UD3, 16GB DDR3-1600, GTX 1060 6GB

Post Reply