Ive been kinda intrigued by that HP Media Server everyones talking about (mainly on podcasts).
I am very interested in buying one. However, I'd much rather run some other form of NAS due to the elimination of any proprietary hardware and software restrictions.
So I was curious how well the software on this device is, and most importantly how is it for temperatures/decibels.
I've noticed it has 2x 80?mm Fan mounts on the back.
Back view:
Thoughts anyone ?
Anyone experimented with that HP MediaSmart Server thing ?
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:41 pm
- Location: Canada
Well, Windows Home Server systems can be great, but the hardware varies wildly from OEM to OEM. HP has a good low-end WHS and it is readily available in the US.
However, if you are so inclined you can build your own by building a budget system and throwing a few large hard drives into it. You can purchase the Home Server OS from many online shops. The benefit of building your own is that you can use old hardware or new hardware of your choice to make sure it's quiet. The biggest downside of the HP WHS systems is that they are completely headless. If there is a problem and you can break the WHS Console (the actual WHS software) you have no way of fixing it without sending it to HP for support. If you build your own, you can have a video card and fix the problems yourself.
WHS is more than just a NAS system, which is good and bad. It's good because it allows you do so much more with the computers on the network like automatic backups, spyware/virus scan updates, file duplication, and many other things. It's bad because the file duplication feature prevents you from using a true RAID solution.
However, it's an extreme length to go to to get a NAS-type function.
However, if you are so inclined you can build your own by building a budget system and throwing a few large hard drives into it. You can purchase the Home Server OS from many online shops. The benefit of building your own is that you can use old hardware or new hardware of your choice to make sure it's quiet. The biggest downside of the HP WHS systems is that they are completely headless. If there is a problem and you can break the WHS Console (the actual WHS software) you have no way of fixing it without sending it to HP for support. If you build your own, you can have a video card and fix the problems yourself.
WHS is more than just a NAS system, which is good and bad. It's good because it allows you do so much more with the computers on the network like automatic backups, spyware/virus scan updates, file duplication, and many other things. It's bad because the file duplication feature prevents you from using a true RAID solution.
However, it's an extreme length to go to to get a NAS-type function.
http://www.mediasmartserver.net/
Great site/for for the HP Media Server.
I'll be picking up one on the next price drop.
Great site/for for the HP Media Server.
I'll be picking up one on the next price drop.
Also, www.wegotserved.co.uk for addins and help once you get one up and running.
AFAIK, file duplication can be turned on or off at the folder/share level.jhhoffma wrote: WHS is more than just a NAS system, which is good and bad. It's good because it allows you do so much more with the computers on the network like automatic backups, spyware/virus scan updates, file duplication, and many other things. It's bad because the file duplication feature prevents you from using a true RAID solution.
I personally have the system disk mirrored (RAID1) and use file duplication for everything else.
Here's pretty thorough discusion of the pro's and con's of RAID on WHS servers:
http://forum.wegotserved.co.uk/index.ph ... 78&hl=RAID