HIS Radeon HD 4890 Turbo Edition

Want to talk about one of the articles in SPCR? Here's the forum for you.
Post Reply
MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12283
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

HIS Radeon HD 4890 Turbo Edition

Post by MikeC » Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:42 pm

Mike Chin, SPCR Editor/Publisher
Support SPCR by buying your gear through this link: Amazon

CA_Steve
Moderator
Posts: 7431
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Location: Monterey Bay, CA

Post by CA_Steve » Mon Apr 13, 2009 4:09 pm

Thanks, Lawrence!
1080p Gaming build: i5-4670K, Mugen 4, Asrock Z97 Anniversary, MSI GTX 1660 Gaming X, 8GB 1866 RAM, Samsung 860 Evo 500GB, Crucial MX100 256GB, WD Red 2TB, Samsung DVD burner, Fractal Define R4, Antec True Quiet 140 (2 front + rear) case fans, Seasonic SSR-550FX. 35W idle, 45-55W video streaming, 170-200W WoW, 318W stress test (Prime95 + Furmark)

~El~Jefe~
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 2887
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:21 pm
Location: New York City zzzz
Contact:

Post by ~El~Jefe~ » Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:56 pm

I'm amazed at how much real power it takes.

It really is not that bad since I have water cooling. my e8400 chip plus this could be fed by my 350 phantom.

Torajirou
Posts: 162
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:16 am
Location: Belgium

Post by Torajirou » Tue Apr 14, 2009 2:26 am

Nice review, but from an SPCR point of view, an insight into how this monster performs using recommended aftermarket heatsinks/fans would have been useful.
Main rig
SilverStone Fortress FT05 / Seasonic Platinum Fanless 520W
Intel i7 3770K / Thermalright HR-02 Macho
Asus Strix GeForce GTX 970 OC
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB

HTPC
Antec ISK310-150 / 2x Noctua NF-R8 PWM / PicoPSU 150W
Intel i3 2125 / Scythe Big Shuriken 2 (fanless)
Intel X25-M 80GB

Thomas
Posts: 664
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 11:21 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by Thomas » Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:14 am

I think SPCR have done very well with graphic cards reviews within the last year or so - many of the interesting cards show up in a review.

Though, I think the VGA reviews in general can be improved - if SPCR choosed an aftermarket cooler or two, to try out with each reviewed card, it would be super. For quiet operation, an aftermarket cooler is often required.

A couple of suggestions for cooler choise: An Accelero (cheap and passive) and a Zalman VF-1000 (fan and small).

Both should be reasonably easy to install, widely compatible and since the test platform is well standardized, the results should be comparable. Temp measurements at idle and full load, would give a good idea of performance.

I dont know how much work this will require in the real world - it sounds simple, when writing it :wink:
AMD Phenom II 925/Asus Triton 75 | Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3H/IGP | Kingston 6GB | Antec P180/S-Flex | Seasonic S12 380/S-Flex | Crucial C300 64 + Samsung F2 EcoGreen | Optiarc 7240s | Dell 2412M | Sidewinder mouse+keyboard | Win7 x64

MoJo
Posts: 773
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 9:20 am
Location: UK

Post by MoJo » Tue Apr 14, 2009 9:37 am

Thanks for the review, it tells you basically everything you need to know in terms of power consumption and what sort of after-market cooler you would need for it.

ATI seem to have given up on PowerPlay for their high end cards. It's a shame because it worked really well with the previous generation. My guess is that it probably has something to do with the GDDR5 RAM used. If you set the BIOS to underclock the RAM on a GDDR5 card it will occasionally freeze.
http://world3.net

shleepy
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 454
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 3:32 am
Location: SF Bay Area, California

Post by shleepy » Tue Apr 14, 2009 9:41 am

When reviews first started popping up for HD4890's, I was surprised by some of the results... But the general consensus now (especially with a solid SPCR article about it) is that it's really not all that efficient. And for gaming benchmarks at high resolutions, it's usually only a couple frames per second ahead of GTX260. It doesn't seem like an awful card, but it's not the power efficient PC gamer's dream, either.

CA_Steve
Moderator
Posts: 7431
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Location: Monterey Bay, CA

Post by CA_Steve » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:07 pm

shleepy wrote:When reviews first started popping up for HD4890's, I was surprised by some of the results... But the general consensus now (especially with a solid SPCR article about it) is that it's really not all that efficient. And for gaming benchmarks at high resolutions, it's usually only a couple frames per second ahead of GTX260. It doesn't seem like an awful card, but it's not the power efficient PC gamer's dream, either.
+1
1080p Gaming build: i5-4670K, Mugen 4, Asrock Z97 Anniversary, MSI GTX 1660 Gaming X, 8GB 1866 RAM, Samsung 860 Evo 500GB, Crucial MX100 256GB, WD Red 2TB, Samsung DVD burner, Fractal Define R4, Antec True Quiet 140 (2 front + rear) case fans, Seasonic SSR-550FX. 35W idle, 45-55W video streaming, 170-200W WoW, 318W stress test (Prime95 + Furmark)

MoJo
Posts: 773
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 9:20 am
Location: UK

Post by MoJo » Tue Apr 14, 2009 2:56 pm

I'm sure it's down to the GDDR 5 memory, or perhaps the memory controller.
http://world3.net

Woolley
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 8:19 pm
Location: Australia

Post by Woolley » Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:28 pm

Good review.

I think it would be a great idea to include a section in each review on how suitable the graphics cards are for after-market coolers. Assessing stock fans is useful, but for a truly silent system you need a passive cooler.

Questions are: What aftermarket coolers would fit, and Can passive coolers adequately cool at load?

twit
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:28 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by twit » Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:39 pm

This article, just like the HD4870 Matrix one contains factual errors regarding Radeon BIOS Editor. Each powerplay state (power saving, UVD, 3D, throttling) has three separate clock modes (low, medium, high) and it is the latter that are shown in green, yellow and red, not the different powerplay states as the article claims.
Antec P182 | Q9450 @ 3.5GHz w/ TRUE/NF-P12 | HD6970 | 6GB OCZ Reaper | Abit IP35 Pro | Auzentech X-meridian | WD CB sys drive, WD GP data drives | Scythe SlipStream 1200 (1 bottom chamber, 1 exhaust) | fans controlled by a mCubed T-Balancer bigNG | 110W idle

twit
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:28 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by twit » Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:58 pm

Woolley wrote:Questions are: What aftermarket coolers would fit, and Can passive coolers adequately cool at load?
Considering the layout is very similar to HD4870, I'd say any 4870 compatible cooler would fit 4890 just fine. With the redesigned and improved VRM circuitry that section of the card should no longer reach the blistering temepratures that killed some adventurous 4870 owners cards, leaving more room for silent coolers. There won't be any aftermarket passive coolers though, the sheer scope of such a beast would be enough to send the metal exchange soaring :)
Antec P182 | Q9450 @ 3.5GHz w/ TRUE/NF-P12 | HD6970 | 6GB OCZ Reaper | Abit IP35 Pro | Auzentech X-meridian | WD CB sys drive, WD GP data drives | Scythe SlipStream 1200 (1 bottom chamber, 1 exhaust) | fans controlled by a mCubed T-Balancer bigNG | 110W idle

Post Reply